Comparison Overview

Southern Vermont Arts Center

VS

Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest

Southern Vermont Arts Center

930 SVAC Drive, Manchester, Vermont, 05254, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Southern Vermont Arts Center creates an inviting environment for our community and members to meet, enjoy, and participate in the arts. Our community includes our children, young adults, our full time residents, our summer residents, our visitors, our donors, and our artists. We offer quality programming including exhibitions, workshops, summer camps, class, performances, and community wide events. We provide our artist members with opportunity to grow through instruction, a place to exhibit their work, and the opportunity to sell their work. We are the stewards of our assets – our endowment, our permanent collection, our campus, and our legacy. We hope you will join us on our beautiful 100-acre campus at the foot of the Taconic Mountains in beautiful Manchester, VT.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest

1776 Poplar Forest Parkway, Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

One of only two homes Thomas Jefferson designed for his personal use, Poplar Forest was the place where Jefferson “came to indulge in the life of the mind and renew his personal creativity.” Jefferson and his wife, Martha, inherited the Bedford County plantation known as Poplar Forest from her father in 1773. When his presidency ended in 1809, Jefferson visited the retreat three or four times a year, often staying for several months at a time during planting seasons. Designated a National Historic Landmark by the Secretary of the Interior, and nearly lost to development, Thomas Jefferson’s Poplar Forest plantation in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains was rescued in 1984 by a group of local citizens who sought to preserve it for the cultural and educational benefit of the public. Poplar Forest was opened to the public for the first time in 1986, in its “before restoration” state. Today, the neoclassical architecture of the octagonal house has been returned to Mr. Jefferson’s design. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has recognized the meticulous research and restoration efforts with its highest award, and the plantation has been nominated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. A visit to Poplar Forest offers a unique opportunity to observe a “live” archaeological dig and historic restoration in progress, as efforts to reveal and restore Thomas Jefferson’s vision for his personal retreat continue.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-vermont-art-center.jpeg
Southern Vermont Arts Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-jefferson's-poplar-forest.jpeg
Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Southern Vermont Arts Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Vermont Arts Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest in 2026.

Incident History — Southern Vermont Arts Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Vermont Arts Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-vermont-art-center.jpeg
Southern Vermont Arts Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-jefferson's-poplar-forest.jpeg
Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Southern Vermont Arts Center company and Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Southern Vermont Arts Center company.

In the current year, Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company and Southern Vermont Arts Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company nor Southern Vermont Arts Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company nor Southern Vermont Arts Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company nor Southern Vermont Arts Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center company nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center company nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest company employs more people globally than Southern Vermont Arts Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Southern Vermont Arts Center nor Corporation for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N