Comparison Overview

Southern California Graphics I SCG

VS

Lake Erie Graphics

Southern California Graphics I SCG

8432 Steller Drive, Culver City, CA, 90232, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.socalgraph.com

Commercial Printing Company and Large Format Printing Service by Southern California Graphics. We have also invested into the HP 10k for our digital printing solutions, lenticular 3d display printing, beauty and cosmetic packaging services, direct mail marketing (variable data), and not to mention SCG offers a one stop shop with shipping, fulfillment, and pre-media solutions in-house. Our family owned and operated Los Angeles Printing company has been in business for over 40 years. Our print marketing services help corporate companies, medium size businesses, fortune 500 entities, and small businesses with their graphic communication projects. We have two websites for more information. Visit www.socalgraph.com for your traditional commercial printing needs, or you can visit www.socalgraphlargeformat.com for your large format needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lake Erie Graphics

5372 West 130th St., Brook Park, OH, 44142, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lakeeriegraphics.com

Lake Erie Graphics is a full service multi-color printer and digital graphics company. We are a one stop print shop specializing in offset printing, digital printing, vehicle wraps, vinyl decals, signs and banners. Lake Erie Graphics offers the right mix of skilled project management, experienced people and cutting-edge technology to ensure your projects are a success.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-california-graphics.jpeg
Southern California Graphics I SCG
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-erie-graphics.jpeg
Lake Erie Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Southern California Graphics I SCG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lake Erie Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern California Graphics I SCG in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lake Erie Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Southern California Graphics I SCG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern California Graphics I SCG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lake Erie Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lake Erie Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-california-graphics.jpeg
Southern California Graphics I SCG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-erie-graphics.jpeg
Lake Erie Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Southern California Graphics I SCG company and Lake Erie Graphics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lake Erie Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Southern California Graphics I SCG company.

In the current year, Lake Erie Graphics company and Southern California Graphics I SCG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lake Erie Graphics company nor Southern California Graphics I SCG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lake Erie Graphics company nor Southern California Graphics I SCG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lake Erie Graphics company nor Southern California Graphics I SCG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG company nor Lake Erie Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG nor Lake Erie Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Southern California Graphics I SCG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lake Erie Graphics company.

Southern California Graphics I SCG company employs more people globally than Lake Erie Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG nor Lake Erie Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG nor Lake Erie Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG nor Lake Erie Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG nor Lake Erie Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG nor Lake Erie Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Southern California Graphics I SCG nor Lake Erie Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References