Comparison Overview

Southeastern Railway Museum

VS

The Royal Compound in Belgrade

Southeastern Railway Museum

3595 Buford Hwy, Duluth, GA, US, 30096
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.southeasternrailwaymuseum.org

The Southeastern Railway Museum occupies a 35-acre site in Duluth, Georgia, in northeast suburban Atlanta. In operation since 1970, the Museum features about 90 items of rolling stock including historic Pullman cars and classic steam locomotives. It is owned and operated by the Atlanta Chapter of the National Railway Historical Society. The Southeastern Railway Museum is recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization for historical and educational purposes. The museum is staffed almost completely with volunteers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Royal Compound in Belgrade

Bulevar Kneza Aleksandra Karađorđevića, Belgrade, 11000, RS
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 700 and 749
http://www.royalfamily.org/

The Royal Compound in Belgrade consists of the Royal Palace (1924-29) and the White Palace (1934-36), built with the private funds of His Majesty King Alexander I. Currently, the Royal Palace is the home of His Royal Highness Crown Prince Alexander II, grandson of the King who built it, his wife Princess Katherine and his two sons, Hereditary Prince Philip and Prince Alexander.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southeastern-railway-museum.jpeg
Southeastern Railway Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-palace.jpeg
The Royal Compound in Belgrade
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Southeastern Railway Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Royal Compound in Belgrade
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southeastern Railway Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Royal Compound in Belgrade in 2026.

Incident History — Southeastern Railway Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southeastern Railway Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Royal Compound in Belgrade (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Royal Compound in Belgrade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southeastern-railway-museum.jpeg
Southeastern Railway Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-palace.jpeg
The Royal Compound in Belgrade
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Southeastern Railway Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Royal Compound in Belgrade company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Royal Compound in Belgrade company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Southeastern Railway Museum company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Royal Compound in Belgrade company and Southeastern Railway Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Royal Compound in Belgrade company nor Southeastern Railway Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Royal Compound in Belgrade company nor Southeastern Railway Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

The Royal Compound in Belgrade company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Southeastern Railway Museum company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum company nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum company nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Southeastern Railway Museum company employs more people globally than The Royal Compound in Belgrade company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Southeastern Railway Museum nor The Royal Compound in Belgrade holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References