Comparison Overview

South Shore Mental Health

VS

Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc.

South Shore Mental Health

500 Victory Road, Quincy, MA, 02171, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1926, South Shore Mental Health has been building hope and changing lives for children born with developmental disabilities and children, teens, and adults living with mental illness. Today, we have more than 700 employees based in Quincy, Marshfield, Plymouth, and Wareham, and our non-profit early intervention and mental health treatment and recovery programs reach 16,000 people annually from Boston to Cape Cod.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 216
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc.

678 Spring Gardens Rd, None, Burlington, Ontario, CA, L7T 1J3
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Anchors’ founding principles are based on the recognition that all individuals have the capacity for learning and growth. We at Anchor are dedicated to ensuring our clients are treated with respect and kindness throughout all aspects of their treatment programs. What sets Anchor apart from the rest is the fundamental recognition that our services may have a profound effect on the lives of each client and their families. Such an important role requires an approach that puts the client first. The provision of Rehabilitation Support Workers (RSW’s), Behaviour Therapy Assistants (BTA’s) and Behaviour Support Workers (BSW's) are the primary service offerings of Anchor. Experience is key to ensuring the best match between each client and RSW and/or BTA. Each of our staff have a minimum of 6 years’ experience working with youth and adults with acquired brain injuries, orthopaedic injuries and/or complex medical needs. Our associates all have completed a post-secondary education in child and youth, behavioural sciences, kinesiology, OTA/PTA, social services workers, addictions, dual diagnosis and mental health. Anchor rehab can help each client navigate a course towards a better future and achieve optimal outcomes in their rehabilitation. Implementation of leading edge and innovative strategies to assist in the treatment and management of impairments is the key to the ongoing success of each client. Anchor provides comprehensive and objective documentation that will assist treatment teams and legal counsel, demonstrate the client’s functional status through accurate monitoring, tracking and reporting. This reporting is critical to help the health professionals determine the suitability of the outcomes as well as the ongoing needs of each client.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-shore-mental-health.jpeg
South Shore Mental Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anchorrss.jpeg
Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
South Shore Mental Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Shore Mental Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — South Shore Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Shore Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-shore-mental-health.jpeg
South Shore Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anchorrss.jpeg
Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

South Shore Mental Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to South Shore Mental Health company.

In the current year, Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company and South Shore Mental Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company nor South Shore Mental Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company nor South Shore Mental Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company nor South Shore Mental Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither South Shore Mental Health company nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither South Shore Mental Health nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither South Shore Mental Health company nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South Shore Mental Health company employs more people globally than Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither South Shore Mental Health nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither South Shore Mental Health nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither South Shore Mental Health nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither South Shore Mental Health nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither South Shore Mental Health nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither South Shore Mental Health nor Anchor Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N