Comparison Overview

South Florida Science Center and Aquarium

VS

Roycroft Campus

South Florida Science Center and Aquarium

4801 Dreher Trail North, West Palm Beach, 33405, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The mission of the South Florida Science Center and Aquarium (SFSCA) is to open every mind to science through the strategic programming of interactive exhibits, engaging community-based camps and events. Founded in 1959 and formerly known as the South Florida Science Museum, the new SFSCA features more than 50 hands-on educational exhibits, an 8,000 gallon fresh and salt water aquarium featuring both local and exotic marine life, a digital planetarium, Conservation Research Station, Florida Exhibit Hall and an interactive Everglades Exhibit showcasing the richly diverse ecosystem that the Everglades water-environment supports. The South Florida Science Center is located at 4801 Dreher Trail North, West Palm Beach. To learn more visit www.sfsciencecenter.org/ or call (561) 832-1988.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Roycroft Campus

31 South Grove St., East Aurora, 14052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Roycroft Campus Corporation (RCC) is a not for profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to the preservation and restoration of the Roycroft Campus, a National Historic Landmark in East Aurora, New York. From 1895 to 1938, the Roycroft Campus was one of the most successful and well-known components of the Arts & Crafts Movement in the United States, consisting of a community of over 500 artisans and craftspeople led by writer and charismatic leader, Elbert Hubbard. In addition to preserving the Roycroft Campus, the RCC’s mission is to inspire visitors to experience the history, ideals, and possibilities of the Head, Heart, Hand philosophy and the art it creates.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-florida-science-center-and-aquarium.jpeg
South Florida Science Center and Aquarium
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
South Florida Science Center and Aquarium
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Roycroft Campus
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Florida Science Center and Aquarium in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roycroft Campus in 2026.

Incident History — South Florida Science Center and Aquarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Florida Science Center and Aquarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Roycroft Campus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roycroft Campus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-florida-science-center-and-aquarium.jpeg
South Florida Science Center and Aquarium
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Roycroft Campus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Roycroft Campus company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company.

In the current year, Roycroft Campus company and South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium nor Roycroft Campus holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company nor Roycroft Campus company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South Florida Science Center and Aquarium company employs more people globally than Roycroft Campus company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium nor Roycroft Campus holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium nor Roycroft Campus holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium nor Roycroft Campus holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium nor Roycroft Campus holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium nor Roycroft Campus holds HIPAA certification.

Neither South Florida Science Center and Aquarium nor Roycroft Campus holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H