Comparison Overview

The Alliance for Florida's National Parks

VS

Vancouver Heritage Foundation

The Alliance for Florida's National Parks

1390 S Dixie Hwy, Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/nationalparksFL

Founded in 2002, The Alliance for Florida’s National Parks is the official philanthropic partner of Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades, Biscayne, and Dry Tortugas National Parks. We instill in all people an appreciation of Florida’s public lands and natural resources for what they are – the key to the sustainability and prosperity of the state. Through three focused pillars of support, The Alliance’s work enriches the park experience and creates deeper connections between diverse communities and the nature that abounds in their backyards. Those pillars are education, exploration, and conservation. More information can be found at www.floridanationalparks.org.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Vancouver Heritage Foundation

402 - 510 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6B 1L8, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vancouverheritagefoundation.org

The Vancouver Heritage Foundation is a registered charity that supports the conservation of heritage buildings and structures, recognizing their contribution to the city’s sustainability, economy and culture. VHF promotes heritage conservation by creating opportunities for the public to learn about and access Vancouver's heritage buildings, and by fostering relationships that aide in the conservation of built heritage. VHF also actively protects our heritage by developing practical tools and incentives that help in the successful conservation of heritage buildings, and by fundraising in the public and private sectors to build an endowment, allowing us to protect our built heritage through granting programs.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-florida-national-parks-trust.jpeg
The Alliance for Florida's National Parks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vancouver-heritage-foundation.jpeg
Vancouver Heritage Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Alliance for Florida's National Parks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vancouver Heritage Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Alliance for Florida's National Parks in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vancouver Heritage Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — The Alliance for Florida's National Parks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Alliance for Florida's National Parks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vancouver Heritage Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vancouver Heritage Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-florida-national-parks-trust.jpeg
The Alliance for Florida's National Parks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vancouver-heritage-foundation.jpeg
Vancouver Heritage Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company and Vancouver Heritage Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Vancouver Heritage Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company.

In the current year, Vancouver Heritage Foundation company and The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vancouver Heritage Foundation company nor The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vancouver Heritage Foundation company nor The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vancouver Heritage Foundation company nor The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both The Alliance for Florida's National Parks company and Vancouver Heritage Foundation company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Alliance for Florida's National Parks nor Vancouver Heritage Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References