Comparison Overview

South Country Health Alliance

VS

CHI

South Country Health Alliance

6380 W Frontage Rd, None, Medford, Minnesota, US, 55049
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.mnscha.org

South Country Health Alliance is a county-based purchasing health plan serving eight Minnesota counties - Brown, Dodge, Goodhue, Kanabec, Sibley, Steele, Wabasha and Waseca - in a joint effort to support accessible, quality health care through partnerships with community services and local providers for Minnesota Health Care Program enrollees.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

CHI

198 Inverness Drive West, Englewood, CO, US, 80112
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.commonspirit.careers

Catholic Health Initiatives, a nonprofit, faith-based health system formed in 1996 through the consolidation of four Catholic health systems, expresses its mission each day by creating and nurturing healthy communities in the hundreds of sites across the nation where we provide care. One of the nation’s largest nonprofit health systems, Englewood, Colo.-based CHI operates in 18 states and comprises 100 hospitals, including two academic health centers, major teaching hospitals and 30 critical-access facilities; community health-services organizations; accredited nursing colleges; home-health agencies; living communities; and other facilities and services that span the inpatient and outpatient continuum of care. In fiscal year 2018, CHI provided more than $1.14 billion in financial assistance and community benefit for programs and services for the poor, free clinics, education and research. Financial assistance and community benefit totaled approximately $2.1 billion with the inclusion of the unpaid costs of Medicare. The health system, which generated operating revenues of $15 billion in fiscal year 2018, has total assets of approximately $20.5 billion. Learn more at www.catholichealthinitiatives.org

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,730
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-country-health-alliance.jpeg
South Country Health Alliance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catholic-health-initiatives.jpeg
CHI
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
South Country Health Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CHI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

South Country Health Alliance has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHI in 2025.

Incident History — South Country Health Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Country Health Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CHI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-country-health-alliance.jpeg
South Country Health Alliance
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catholic-health-initiatives.jpeg
CHI
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CHI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South Country Health Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CHI company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to South Country Health Alliance company.

In the current year, South Country Health Alliance company has reported more cyber incidents than CHI company.

CHI company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while South Country Health Alliance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both CHI company and South Country Health Alliance company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

CHI company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while South Country Health Alliance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither South Country Health Alliance company nor CHI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor CHI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CHI company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to South Country Health Alliance company.

CHI company employs more people globally than South Country Health Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor CHI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor CHI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor CHI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor CHI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor CHI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor CHI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References