Comparison Overview

South Country Health Alliance

VS

Aster DM Healthcare

South Country Health Alliance

6380 W Frontage Rd, None, Medford, Minnesota, US, 55049
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 650 and 699

South Country Health Alliance is a county-based purchasing health plan serving eight Minnesota counties - Brown, Dodge, Goodhue, Kanabec, Sibley, Steele, Wabasha and Waseca - in a joint effort to support accessible, quality health care through partnerships with community services and local providers for Minnesota Health Care Program enrollees.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Aster DM Healthcare

AE
Last Update: 2025-12-09

From a single medical centre to a performance-driven healthcare enterprise spread across more than 400+ medical establishments, including 15 hospitals, 120 clinics and 307 pharmacies in GCC and growing, Aster DM Healthcare has transitioned into being the leading healthcare authority across the Middle East. Currently one of the largest and fastest growing conglomerates in the MENA region, Aster DM Healthcare covers the full spectrum of healthcare services. An expansive portfolio includes hospitals and clinics, pharmacies, diagnostic centres, educational institutions, healthcare management and healthcare support systems. Headquartered in Dubai, the Aster DM network now encompasses more than 19,657 employees( Doctors, Nurses, Others) with JCI accredited clinics and diagnostic centres. Never content to rest on its laurels, Aster DM Healthcare is constantly seeking opportunities to set new yardsticks with advanced developments. With many more innovative and ambitious initiatives, Aster DM Healthcare has radically catalyzed the healthcare revolution across Middle East Each of the Group’s verticals is a symbol of distinction, driven by the commitment to build a healthier tomorrow and to take healthcare to the next level of excellence.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 18,560
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-country-health-alliance.jpeg
South Country Health Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asterdmhealthcare.jpeg
Aster DM Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
South Country Health Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aster DM Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

South Country Health Alliance has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aster DM Healthcare in 2025.

Incident History — South Country Health Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Country Health Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aster DM Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aster DM Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-country-health-alliance.jpeg
South Country Health Alliance
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asterdmhealthcare.jpeg
Aster DM Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aster DM Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South Country Health Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

South Country Health Alliance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aster DM Healthcare company has not reported any.

In the current year, South Country Health Alliance company has reported more cyber incidents than Aster DM Healthcare company.

Neither Aster DM Healthcare company nor South Country Health Alliance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

South Country Health Alliance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Aster DM Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aster DM Healthcare company nor South Country Health Alliance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither South Country Health Alliance company nor Aster DM Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor Aster DM Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aster DM Healthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to South Country Health Alliance company.

Aster DM Healthcare company employs more people globally than South Country Health Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor Aster DM Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor Aster DM Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor Aster DM Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor Aster DM Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor Aster DM Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither South Country Health Alliance nor Aster DM Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H