Comparison Overview

South Carolina State University

VS

Los Angeles Unified School District

South Carolina State University

US, 29115
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

http://www.scsu.edu/campus_tour.cfm

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Los Angeles Unified School District

333 S Beaudry Ave, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90017
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 600 and 649

Second largest school district in the nation, LAUSD enrolls nearly 575,000 students in kindergarten through 12th grade, at over 900 schools, and 187 public charter schools. The boundaries spread over 710 square miles and include the mega-city of Los Angeles as well as all or parts of 31 smaller municipalities plus several unincorporated sections of Southern California. The mission of LAUSD is reflected in continued double-digit growth on the state Academic Performance Index (API); the upward trend in the graduation rate, progress in the pass rate on the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) and other academic indicators. LA schools boast more winners of the United States Academic Decathlon championships-12-than any other District in this country. Add to those impressive victories, outstanding individual student and team achievements in: science, mathematics, social studies, language arts, foreign and dual languages, business and entrepreneurial skills, the visual and performing arts, and athletics. Nationally recognized by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine for serving healthy, low fat and vegetarian school lunches. LAUSD's standards also call for: whole grains, low sodium, locally grown fruits and vegetables and no trans fat; flavored milk or carbonated beverages. Today, the District counts more than 115 new schools and campuses, thanks to the nation's largest public works project, funded by bond measures, a testament to broad voter support.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 44,564
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
South Carolina State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/los-angeles-unified-school-district.jpeg
Los Angeles Unified School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
South Carolina State University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Los Angeles Unified School District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Carolina State University in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Angeles Unified School District in 2025.

Incident History — South Carolina State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Carolina State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Los Angeles Unified School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Angeles Unified School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
South Carolina State University
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Software Glitch
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/los-angeles-unified-school-district.jpeg
Los Angeles Unified School District
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

South Carolina State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Los Angeles Unified School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to South Carolina State University company.

In the current year, Los Angeles Unified School District company and South Carolina State University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while South Carolina State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has disclosed at least one data breach, while South Carolina State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while South Carolina State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither South Carolina State University company nor Los Angeles Unified School District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither South Carolina State University nor Los Angeles Unified School District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither South Carolina State University company nor Los Angeles Unified School District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Los Angeles Unified School District company employs more people globally than South Carolina State University company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither South Carolina State University nor Los Angeles Unified School District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither South Carolina State University nor Los Angeles Unified School District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither South Carolina State University nor Los Angeles Unified School District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither South Carolina State University nor Los Angeles Unified School District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither South Carolina State University nor Los Angeles Unified School District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither South Carolina State University nor Los Angeles Unified School District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X