Comparison Overview

South African National Defence Force

VS

Indian Army

South African National Defence Force

Delmas Ave, Ekurhuleni, 1459, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

National Defence Force of South Africa

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 3,406
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Indian Army

IN, 110022
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Indian Army is the largest branch of the Indian Armed Forces and is responsible for land-based military operations. Its primary mission is the National Security and Defense of India from external aggression and threats, and maintaining peace and security within its borders. It also conducts humanitarian rescue operations during natural calamities and other disturbances. The Indian Army is one of the three services under the Ministry of Defence. The President of India is the Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Armed Forces, and thus of the Indian Army. The highest ranking military officer is the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), who is also a member of the Chiefs of Staff Committee. The Indian Army came into being at the Independence of India in 1947, and inherited most of the regiments and infrastructure of the British Indian Army that were located in post-partition India.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 32,762
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-african-national-defense-force.jpeg
South African National Defence Force
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-army.jpeg
Indian Army
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
South African National Defence Force
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indian Army
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South African National Defence Force in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indian Army in 2025.

Incident History — South African National Defence Force (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South African National Defence Force cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indian Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-african-national-defense-force.jpeg
South African National Defence Force
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)
Motivation: Retaliation for publishing information about Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-army.jpeg
Indian Army
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indian Army company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South African National Defence Force company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

South African National Defence Force company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indian Army company has not reported any.

In the current year, Indian Army company and South African National Defence Force company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indian Army company nor South African National Defence Force company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indian Army company nor South African National Defence Force company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

South African National Defence Force company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Indian Army company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither South African National Defence Force company nor Indian Army company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither South African National Defence Force nor Indian Army holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither South African National Defence Force company nor Indian Army company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indian Army company employs more people globally than South African National Defence Force company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither South African National Defence Force nor Indian Army holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither South African National Defence Force nor Indian Army holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither South African National Defence Force nor Indian Army holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither South African National Defence Force nor Indian Army holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither South African National Defence Force nor Indian Army holds HIPAA certification.

Neither South African National Defence Force nor Indian Army holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X