Comparison Overview

SOURCC

VS

DeKalb Office

SOURCC

111 N. Wrenn Street, High Point, 27260, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sourcc.com

SOURCC is the ultimate way for interior designers to source the world's best trade products. We've modernized the traditional 'bricks and mortar' showroom concept and combined it with an innovative web platform that features powerful business tools delivered in a simple and elegant package. It's a whole new experience for a quickly changing industry.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DeKalb Office

1320 Ridgeland Parkway, Alpharetta, GA, 30004, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dekalboffice.com

DeKalb Office has come a long way since opening its doors for business in 1952 as an office furniture supplier in Decatur, GA. Today we are a creative, knowledgeable and collaborative partner providing innovative workplace solutions to a remarkably diverse client base. We serve some of the nation’s top corporations, hospitals and medical centers, as well as many colleges, universities, governmental agencies and private businesses large and small. In 2011, DeKalb Office opened a second location in Birmingham, Alabama. DeKalb Office has a simple way of accomplishing complicated goals. We work extraordinarily hard, invest in ourselves and put faith in both proven methods and cutting-edge innovation. According to those principles, we are proud partners with Steelcase, a leading global provider of workplace products and services. Like DeKalb Office, Steelcase is a strong company with a history of leadership in its field, a commitment to exceptional quality and forward-looking solutions to today’s most demanding workplace problems.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sourcc.jpeg
SOURCC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dekalb-office-environments.jpeg
DeKalb Office
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SOURCC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DeKalb Office
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SOURCC in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DeKalb Office in 2025.

Incident History — SOURCC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SOURCC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DeKalb Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DeKalb Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sourcc.jpeg
SOURCC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dekalb-office-environments.jpeg
DeKalb Office
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DeKalb Office company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SOURCC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DeKalb Office company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SOURCC company.

In the current year, DeKalb Office company and SOURCC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DeKalb Office company nor SOURCC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DeKalb Office company nor SOURCC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DeKalb Office company nor SOURCC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SOURCC company nor DeKalb Office company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SOURCC nor DeKalb Office holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DeKalb Office company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SOURCC company.

DeKalb Office company employs more people globally than SOURCC company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither SOURCC nor DeKalb Office holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SOURCC nor DeKalb Office holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SOURCC nor DeKalb Office holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SOURCC nor DeKalb Office holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SOURCC nor DeKalb Office holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SOURCC nor DeKalb Office holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References