Comparison Overview

Sound Business Forms

VS

Technoprint

Sound Business Forms

9600 Stone Ave N 300, Seattle, Washington 98103-2802, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.soundbusinessforms.com/

Sound Business Forms is a Seattle based family business started in 1979 as a traditional business forms distribution company. We have evolved our core products and services to include our own design department, warehouse facilities, fulfillment capabilities and delivery service. SBF remains a family business today and we look forward to helping you with your next project. 9600 Stone Ave N 300, Seattle, Washington, United States.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Technoprint

The Old School, Winsford, cw7 2pg, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.technoprint.net

Technoprint has built a reputation as a supplier that consistently offers a reliable and rapid service whilst guaranteeing complete product security. All processes, from artwork design, to production of printing plates, printing and folding are all carried out on-site in a self contained unit. This gives Technoprint total control and allows us to offer the rapid response required from our customers. The complete manufacturing process is performed in strictly controlled conditions in an air conditioned self contained factory unit with 24 hour CCTV monitoring and recording facilities. Access into the unit is controlled with security coded entrance doors and the whole site has a walled perimeter offering total security. We pride ourselves on the efficient service we offer with a personal touch. Long term relationships have been forged by consistently offering reliability that regularly exceeds our customers expectations. Technoprint are dedicated to continuous improvement supplying total product security and quality and are accredited to ISO9001, PS9000 (pharmaceutical good manufacturing procedure) and ISO14001.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sound-business-forms.jpeg
Sound Business Forms
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technoprint.jpeg
Technoprint
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sound Business Forms
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technoprint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sound Business Forms in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technoprint in 2025.

Incident History — Sound Business Forms (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sound Business Forms cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technoprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technoprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sound-business-forms.jpeg
Sound Business Forms
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technoprint.jpeg
Technoprint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sound Business Forms company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technoprint company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technoprint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sound Business Forms company.

In the current year, Technoprint company and Sound Business Forms company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technoprint company nor Sound Business Forms company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technoprint company nor Sound Business Forms company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technoprint company nor Sound Business Forms company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sound Business Forms company nor Technoprint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sound Business Forms nor Technoprint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sound Business Forms company nor Technoprint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Technoprint company employs more people globally than Sound Business Forms company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sound Business Forms nor Technoprint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sound Business Forms nor Technoprint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sound Business Forms nor Technoprint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sound Business Forms nor Technoprint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sound Business Forms nor Technoprint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sound Business Forms nor Technoprint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References