Comparison Overview

SONIC

VS

ZAMP

SONIC

3 Glenlake Pkwy NE, None, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30328
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

SONIC®, America’s Drive-In®, is part of the Inspire Brands family of restaurants. Inspire is a multi-brand restaurant company whose portfolio includes more than 8,300 Arby’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, and SONIC locations worldwide.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 1,682
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

ZAMP

São Paulo, SP, BR, 05501-050
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Somos um grande ecossistema de restaurantes que reúne marcas internacionais como Burger King®, Popeyes®, Starbucks® e Subway®. E, por trás de cada receita de sucesso, estão os Zampers: gente que faz acontecer, que joga junto e que deixa sua marca todos os dias. Aqui, a gente acredita que o verdadeiro sabor do sucesso é ter espaço pra criar, crescer, liderar e ser quem você é. Usamos tecnologia, inovação e muita parceria para entregar experiências que surpreendem nossos clientes e geram oportunidades para o nosso time. Temos apetite pelo futuro e ousadia para conquistar novos mercados, novos sabores e novas conexões. Porque grandes marcas só existem quando grandes pessoas constroem algo maior do que elas mesmas. Isso é a Zamp®: um ecossistema de restaurantes e pessoas em constante evolução.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 11,270
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonic-drive-in.jpeg
SONIC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zamp.jpeg
ZAMP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SONIC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ZAMP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONIC in 2026.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZAMP in 2026.

Incident History — SONIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ZAMP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZAMP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonic-drive-in.jpeg
SONIC
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zamp.jpeg
ZAMP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ZAMP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SONIC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SONIC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ZAMP company has not reported any.

In the current year, ZAMP company and SONIC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ZAMP company nor SONIC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ZAMP company nor SONIC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

SONIC company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while ZAMP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SONIC company nor ZAMP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SONIC nor ZAMP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ZAMP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SONIC company.

ZAMP company employs more people globally than SONIC company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither SONIC nor ZAMP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SONIC nor ZAMP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SONIC nor ZAMP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SONIC nor ZAMP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SONIC nor ZAMP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SONIC nor ZAMP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H