Comparison Overview

Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness

VS

San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital

Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness

12301 Whitewater Dr, Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55343, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Everyone has a story. This is ours. We believe emotional wellness matters (a lot), and that everyone has the right to make it a priority. Unfortunately, it’s not always that simple. So many questions can get in the way. Maybe you’ve even asked them yourself: Is this normal? Can talking to someone really help me? What is therapy all about, anyway? What would people say if they knew I was going? How do I find the right therapist? Will I be comfortable there? When will I find the time? Will my insurance pay for this? If this sounds like you, you’re not alone. And we can help. We're Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness. We’re a group psychology practice of passionate and experienced psychologists, therapists, and psychiatrists. Our mission is to cultivate awareness and provide services that inspire and achieve emotional wellness in all communities, so everyone can live their best story. We provide a comprehensive range of behavioral health services within one group practice to meet you right where you are. To us, that means not only: - Excellent individual, couples, family, and group therapy offerings - Services for children, adolescents, adults, and elders - A wide range of treatment approaches and areas of expertise - A multidisciplinary team of experienced behavioral health care professionals - In-network services for most insurers - Weekday, evening, and weekend appointments …but also: - A scenic and comfortable setting - Warm and welcoming team members - Everything you need to find the perfect “fit” with a therapist - Reassurance that you’re not alone - Tools and support to help you Live Your Best Story… both while you’re here and long after you leave At Sonder, we don’t just believe in our mission. We’ve built our whole practice around it. That's our story. Ready to live yours?

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital

8550 Huebner Rd., San Antonio , Texas, 78240, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital (SABHH) is a 198-bed, acute care behavioral health & substance use / misuse treatment facility offering services to children as young as 9 years of age to older adults. TSABHH offers evidence based treatment such as trauma informed care and prolonged exposure. SATBHH is a state of the art facility offering our patients the most update safety products, off unit dining, outside recreation and a full court gym and more. In addition, we specialize in working with active duty military and have a unit dedicated solely to family sexual trauma. Services offered are 24/7/365 and start with a NO COST assessment for services. Service lines include: • Adult Crisis stabilization, Medication assisted Detox and short term rehabilitation for substance use/misuse (18 to older adults) * Children / Adolescents Crisis Stabilization for children as young as 9 years old to 17. * Medication assisted detox for Adolescents . • Partial Hospitalization for children as young as 9 years to older adults • Intensive Outpatient Care both day and evening programs SABHH offers patient center cared and uniquely tailored to the individual needs of every patient. #Healingiswhatwedo

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 184
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonderbehavioralhealth&wellness.jpeg
Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-behavioral-healthcare-hospital.jpeg
San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonderbehavioralhealth&wellness.jpeg
Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-behavioral-healthcare-hospital.jpeg
San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company and San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company.

In the current year, San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company and Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company nor Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company nor Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company nor Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital company employs more people globally than Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sonder Behavioral Health & Wellness nor San Antonio Behavioral Healthcare Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N