Comparison Overview

SoMoLend

VS

Fidelity National Financial

SoMoLend

None
Last Update: 2025-03-20 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

SoMoLend is a super savvy web- and mobile-based Peer-to-Peer ("P2P") company with a big heart for connecting entrepreneurs with investors, and vice versa. Our patent-pending technology allows small business borrowers to receive commercial loans from friends and family, customers, Chambers of Commerce, cities, Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter connections, and even traditional lending institutions. Visit www.SoMoLend.com today for more information.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fidelity National Financial

601 Riverside Avenue, Building 5, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32204
Last Update: 2025-08-21 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE: FNF) is a leading provider of title insurance and transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries. Ranked #359 on the FORTUNE 500(r) list for 2023, FNF is the nation's largest title insurance company through our title insurance underwriters (Fidelity National Title, Chicago Title, Commonwealth Land Title, Alamo Title and National Title Insurance of New York) that collectively issue more title insurance policies than any other title company in the United States. Our mission is to advance, expand, and protect the experience of property ownership by making the safety of our customers our primary focus. We pride ourselves on being extremely customer-oriented, motivated, and quick to provide solutions for all of your title insurance needs. We strongly encourage employee ownership of company stock so our FNF family can share in our companyโ€™s continuous growth and be a valuable part of something bigger than themselves.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,501
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/somolend.jpeg
SoMoLend
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-national-financial.jpeg
Fidelity National Financial
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
SoMoLend
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fidelity National Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoMoLend in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity National Financial in 2025.

Incident History โ€” SoMoLend (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoMoLend cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Fidelity National Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity National Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/somolend.jpeg
SoMoLend
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-national-financial.jpeg
Fidelity National Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2013
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both SoMoLend company and Fidelity National Financial company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Fidelity National Financial company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SoMoLend company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fidelity National Financial company and SoMoLend company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fidelity National Financial company nor SoMoLend company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fidelity National Financial company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SoMoLend company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fidelity National Financial company nor SoMoLend company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SoMoLend company nor Fidelity National Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

SoMoLend company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fidelity National Financial company.

Fidelity National Financial company employs more people globally than SoMoLend company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X