Comparison Overview

Somerset House

VS

de Havilland Aircraft Museum

Somerset House

Strand, London, undefined, WC2R 1LA, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Somerset House is a new kind of arts centre in the heart of London, designed for today’s audiences and creatives. Offering a diverse and dynamic public programme of contemporary arts and culture, we are also a home to a large community of creative businesses, artists and makers, including Somerset House Studios. One of the city’s most spectacular and well-loved spaces, we are a place where art and culture is imagined, made and experienced by our 3 million visitors every year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 343
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

de Havilland Aircraft Museum

Salisbury Hall, London Colney, undefined, AL2 1BU, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The DHAMT (de Havilland Aircraft Museum Trust) is an organisation set up to preserve the Aircraft and other aviation related products produced by Sir Geoffrey deHavilland and his design team. The museums first Aircraft was the Prototype DH98 Mosquito which was brought to the site in 1959, thus making us the oldest Aircraft museum in the UK. Britain’s oldest aviation museum and much more besides Our fine collection of iconic de Havilland aircraft, including Mosquito, Sea Vixen and Comet, is just the start. The museum also includes • displays and exhibits of aviation technology: radar, piston and jet engines and missiles • films, exhibits and displays of wartime operations, weapons trials and military jet aircraft • interior access to the Comet, Trident and DH 146 demonstrating the evolution of modern jet air travel • the ongoing restoration to flying condition of a de Havilland Rapide • a bookshop with extensive stock of new and out of print material • an art exhibition of de Havilland aircraft • a café serving drinks and snacks that you can use without entering the museum The museum is primarily run by volunteers and is open 6 days a week.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/somerset-house-trust.jpeg
Somerset House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-havilland-aircraft-heritage-centre.jpeg
de Havilland Aircraft Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Somerset House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
de Havilland Aircraft Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Somerset House in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for de Havilland Aircraft Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Somerset House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Somerset House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — de Havilland Aircraft Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

de Havilland Aircraft Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/somerset-house-trust.jpeg
Somerset House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-havilland-aircraft-heritage-centre.jpeg
de Havilland Aircraft Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Somerset House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to de Havilland Aircraft Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, de Havilland Aircraft Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Somerset House company.

In the current year, de Havilland Aircraft Museum company and Somerset House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither de Havilland Aircraft Museum company nor Somerset House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither de Havilland Aircraft Museum company nor Somerset House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither de Havilland Aircraft Museum company nor Somerset House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Somerset House company nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Somerset House nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Somerset House company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to de Havilland Aircraft Museum company.

Somerset House company employs more people globally than de Havilland Aircraft Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Somerset House nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Somerset House nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Somerset House nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Somerset House nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Somerset House nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Somerset House nor de Havilland Aircraft Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H