Comparison Overview

Solutions For Life

VS

Cedar Rapids Community School District

Solutions For Life

undefined, undefined, undefined, 82633, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Solutions For Life utilizes a holistic approach incorporating multiple therapeutic interventions for the prevention and treatment of mental health disorders. The client or the referral source calls to arrange a mutually acceptable appointment for a clinical assessment. The clerical staff receives the call and completes a Request for Services form that lists the clients presenting problem, name, phone number, address, referral source and any pertinent insurance considerations. When clients present for their initial appointment, they will: •Be informed of their client rights •Sign client consent for treatment •Be assisted in arranging for billing/payment arrangements •Complete demographic data entry The primary purpose of the program is to prevent mental health disorders or to obtain maximum function and quality of life for persons with mental health disorders. The staff will work with the individual to ensure equal accessibility to a variety of services such as: •Case management •Clinical assessment (intake) •Community based treatment services •Continuing Care •Emergency services •General outpatient services (individual/family therapy, and group therapy that are both agency and community based). •Prevention education •Psychiatric services •Psycho-educational groups •Referral to other services or providers, advocacy groups and self help •Skill Training •Supports and services offered by other agencies Individualized treatment services will be provided as identified through the clinical assessment, psychological testing, and treatment planning. Fees are determined on a sliding fee scale based on gross annual household income, or according to contract requirements. Emergency services are provided for persons in need of immediate assistance by calling the SOLUTIONS FOR LIFE phone number to reach the on-call therapist. Please contact us if you have any questions: [email protected]

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cedar Rapids Community School District

FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., Cedar Rapids, 52402, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Offering quality counseling and psychological assessment within a caring and comfortable atmosphere. Call us. We can help with: Relationship problems, such as between spouses and within families and step-families Intense emotional pain, like depression, anger and anxiety Long-standing problems in coping, like substance abuse, eating disorders, dissociative disorders, sexual disorders and personality disorders We can help by listening and assisting you in finding your own solutions. Some specialized techniques that we use include: Behavior therapy Cognitive therapy Interpersonal therapy Play therapy Theraplay Imago Relationship Therapy EMDR Please call us to find out how we can be of assistance to you. (319) 378-1199.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solutions-for-life.jpeg
Solutions For Life
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cedar Rapids Community School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Solutions For Life
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cedar Rapids Community School District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Solutions For Life in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedar Rapids Community School District in 2026.

Incident History — Solutions For Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Solutions For Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cedar Rapids Community School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedar Rapids Community School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solutions-for-life.jpeg
Solutions For Life
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cedar Rapids Community School District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Solutions For Life company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cedar Rapids Community School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cedar Rapids Community School District company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Solutions For Life company.

In the current year, Cedar Rapids Community School District company and Solutions For Life company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cedar Rapids Community School District company nor Solutions For Life company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cedar Rapids Community School District company nor Solutions For Life company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cedar Rapids Community School District company nor Solutions For Life company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Solutions For Life company nor Cedar Rapids Community School District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Solutions For Life nor Cedar Rapids Community School District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Solutions For Life company nor Cedar Rapids Community School District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Solutions For Life company employs more people globally than Cedar Rapids Community School District company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Solutions For Life nor Cedar Rapids Community School District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Solutions For Life nor Cedar Rapids Community School District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Solutions For Life nor Cedar Rapids Community School District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Solutions For Life nor Cedar Rapids Community School District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Solutions For Life nor Cedar Rapids Community School District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Solutions For Life nor Cedar Rapids Community School District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N