Comparison Overview

Solo

VS

Laser Cutting Shapes

Solo

Mariners Wharf, London, SE1 2EL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 800 and 849

We are an integrated design, communications and print production company based at London Bridge. We support and provide all aspects of design, communications, new media and print production to a wide and eclectic client base. We're a small but dedicated team of ten people that prides itself on a hands-on approach that produces high quality and effective, award winning work, on time and on budget.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 647
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Laser Cutting Shapes

6522 Singletree Drive, Columbus, 43229, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Laser Cutting Shapes is your answer for precise laser cutting and laser engraving services in NY, Boston, Chicago, Columbus, Central Ohio, the Midwest, and the United States. We also laser cut for clients in Europe, Canada, and Mexico. We specialize in laser cutting services and laser marking of a variety of materials including: acrylic, plastics, paper, cardboard, leather, textiles, wood, vinyl, mirrors and many more. We also offer design services - helping you to realize your ideas with the precision of lasers.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solo.jpeg
Solo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-cutting-shapes.jpeg
Laser Cutting Shapes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Solo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laser Cutting Shapes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Solo in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laser Cutting Shapes in 2025.

Incident History — Solo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Solo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laser Cutting Shapes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laser Cutting Shapes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solo.jpeg
Solo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-cutting-shapes.jpeg
Laser Cutting Shapes
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Solo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Laser Cutting Shapes company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laser Cutting Shapes company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Solo company.

In the current year, Laser Cutting Shapes company and Solo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laser Cutting Shapes company nor Solo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laser Cutting Shapes company nor Solo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laser Cutting Shapes company nor Solo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Solo company nor Laser Cutting Shapes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Solo nor Laser Cutting Shapes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Solo company nor Laser Cutting Shapes company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Solo company employs more people globally than Laser Cutting Shapes company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Solo nor Laser Cutting Shapes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Solo nor Laser Cutting Shapes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Solo nor Laser Cutting Shapes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Solo nor Laser Cutting Shapes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Solo nor Laser Cutting Shapes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Solo nor Laser Cutting Shapes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X