Comparison Overview

Sole Source Technology

VS

MacFinder

Sole Source Technology

92 Argonaut, Suite 100, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Sole Source connects the world’s leading technology companies with government and commercial end users, providing the leading edge of hardware, software and services. We support Value Added Resellers and their customers by reducing cost, delivering quickly, driving profitability and providing a sustained competitive advantage. We can also locate and deliver hard to find and legacy products and connect you to the global supply quickly, efficiently and affordably. We are the choice for many Federal Government VARS, providing TAA compliant products and greatly simplifying the supply chain.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MacFinder

Provided Upon Request, Ipswich, Suffolk, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We Are MacFinder. (Formerly MacBank) The UK’s foremost provider in refurbished Apple Macs but we’re more than just that. We’re people. people that will be there for you when you’re not sure what MacBook to buy for your child for Christmas, or what iMac you need to run all the software you use in your new business venture and assist you with any technical queries. MacFinder part of the MacRefresh group. The UK’s leading reseller of affordable refurbished Apple equipment. With years of experience in the sector, we have a 40+ strong workforce who work together with pride in supplying the best quality products and services. We recruit employees who exemplify our core values and invest heavily in their training to ensure they maximise their potential and can always meet our customer’s expectations. Our team of skilled, experienced IT professionals come from a wide range of backgrounds, provide expert service, tailored to any requirement.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sole-source-technology.jpeg
Sole Source Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfinder.jpeg
MacFinder
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sole Source Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MacFinder
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sole Source Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MacFinder in 2025.

Incident History — Sole Source Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sole Source Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MacFinder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MacFinder cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sole-source-technology.jpeg
Sole Source Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfinder.jpeg
MacFinder
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MacFinder company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sole Source Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MacFinder company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sole Source Technology company.

In the current year, MacFinder company and Sole Source Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MacFinder company nor Sole Source Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MacFinder company nor Sole Source Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MacFinder company nor Sole Source Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sole Source Technology company nor MacFinder company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sole Source Technology nor MacFinder holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sole Source Technology company nor MacFinder company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sole Source Technology company employs more people globally than MacFinder company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Sole Source Technology nor MacFinder holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sole Source Technology nor MacFinder holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sole Source Technology nor MacFinder holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sole Source Technology nor MacFinder holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sole Source Technology nor MacFinder holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sole Source Technology nor MacFinder holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H