Comparison Overview

Sojo & Mouse

VS

Red Hen Press

Sojo & Mouse

Beeston, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG9, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Sojo Publishing Mouse is a publishing house with a difference. Our aim is to create wonderfully original children’s books, which provide a platform for authors and illustrators to share and showcase their work on a much larger scale than the increasingly popular self-publishing route. In an industry where many established publishing giants don’t have the capacity to take on new writers, and keep with what they know, this publishing mouse actively seeks out fresh and original work, and work that breaks the mould of the traditional children’s picture book. It is the brainchild of two creative-education practitioners, who day-to-day use their craft to stimulate and inspire the imaginations of young children. Helen, a drama practitioner, and Sophie, an illustrator/animator, both regularly work with primary age children in schools and on other private projects, and see the wonderful effect that stories and pictures can have in firing up young minds. When working on a collaborative workshop with their respective companies, Sojo Animation and Sprouts, they created a story that had to be told! But when finding out that regular publishers have many guidelines and tend to dismiss children’s books already with illustrations, and not wanting to tear apart the wonderful work they’d already done, they began to look into other ways of doing it. And never ones to want to do things by halves, Sojo Publishing Mouse was born…!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Red Hen Press

91114, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

The mission of Red Hen Press is to discover, publish, and promote works of literary excellence that have been overlooked by mainstream presses, and to build audiences for literature in two ways: by fostering the literacy of youth and by bringing distinguished and emerging writers to the public stage. Our purpose is first to create and promote good writing. We wish to create a place in the world for good writers, whose work is ignored by the conglomerate publishers, but whose voices deserve to be heard, particularly writers whose work has been marginalized. We seek a diversity of voices that speak to what it means to be human and speak it well. We will endeavor toward the promotion of cultural literacy in the community. We will share books; readings, poetry, literature and ideas. Our goal is to allow good work to swim to the surface and then to share that work so that literature can create a common language space for global, community and individual transformation.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sojopublishingmouse.jpeg
Sojo & Mouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-hen-press.jpeg
Red Hen Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sojo & Mouse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Hen Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sojo & Mouse in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Hen Press in 2025.

Incident History — Sojo & Mouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sojo & Mouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Hen Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Hen Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sojopublishingmouse.jpeg
Sojo & Mouse
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-hen-press.jpeg
Red Hen Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Red Hen Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sojo & Mouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Red Hen Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sojo & Mouse company.

In the current year, Red Hen Press company and Sojo & Mouse company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Red Hen Press company nor Sojo & Mouse company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Red Hen Press company nor Sojo & Mouse company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Hen Press company nor Sojo & Mouse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sojo & Mouse company nor Red Hen Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sojo & Mouse nor Red Hen Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sojo & Mouse company nor Red Hen Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Red Hen Press company employs more people globally than Sojo & Mouse company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Sojo & Mouse nor Red Hen Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sojo & Mouse nor Red Hen Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sojo & Mouse nor Red Hen Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sojo & Mouse nor Red Hen Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sojo & Mouse nor Red Hen Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sojo & Mouse nor Red Hen Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.