Comparison Overview

SODL & INGRAM PLLC

VS

DLA Piper

SODL & INGRAM PLLC

1617 San Marco Blvd, Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://si-law.com

For clients with a need for commercial real estate counsel, Sodl & Ingram provides advice informed by direct experience with transactions, financing, governmental regulation, and corporate organizations. We provide a holistic perspective of the legal and political landscapes to position complex real estate projects for success.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DLA Piper

160 Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4HT, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

NAICS: 54111
NAICS Definition: Offices of Lawyers
Employees: 13,333
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sodl-ingram.jpeg
SODL & INGRAM PLLC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dla-piper.jpeg
DLA Piper
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SODL & INGRAM PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DLA Piper
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SODL & INGRAM PLLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.

Incident History — SODL & INGRAM PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SODL & INGRAM PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sodl-ingram.jpeg
SODL & INGRAM PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dla-piper.jpeg
DLA Piper
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DLA Piper company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SODL & INGRAM PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DLA Piper company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SODL & INGRAM PLLC company.

In the current year, DLA Piper company and SODL & INGRAM PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DLA Piper company nor SODL & INGRAM PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DLA Piper company nor SODL & INGRAM PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DLA Piper company nor SODL & INGRAM PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC company nor DLA Piper company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC nor DLA Piper holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DLA Piper company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SODL & INGRAM PLLC company.

DLA Piper company employs more people globally than SODL & INGRAM PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Law Practice.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC nor DLA Piper holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC nor DLA Piper holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC nor DLA Piper holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC nor DLA Piper holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC nor DLA Piper holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SODL & INGRAM PLLC nor DLA Piper holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References