Comparison Overview

SODA Visual Ltd

VS

FPI Studios

SODA Visual Ltd

149 Fonthill Road, London, England, N4 3, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Our founders, Paul Bence and Romain Kedochim, are old friends. They share a passion that sits at the heart of our business: combining technology and creativity to create stylish photography and unique, narrative-led films. Having powerful, engaging content is a must in today’s ‘always on’ world. Consumers demand it. As a result, the worlds of photography and film have collided. We have embraced this amalgamation and adopt a friendly, collaborative approach where everyone involved has fun. We find this, combined with meticulous project management, is the secret to crafting spectacular campaigns. Being technically-minded individuals that are not afraid to give their creativity free rein, Paul and Romain are well-placed to deliver the bespoke visual media solution you require.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FPI Studios

2901 Auburn Rd, Auburn HIlls, Michigan 48326, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1989 by photographer Jim Frenak, FPI Studios has been providing superior imagery to the advertising, public relations, and editorial industries for over 20 years. We are a full service operation, offering photography and high-end retouching services to meet the needs of any client. Our vast experience in the industry combined with our studio locations in Detroit and Phoenix, allow us to handle all aspects of photography production in both an economical and timely manner for all of our clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soda-visual-ltd.jpeg
SODA Visual Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fpi-studios.jpeg
FPI Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SODA Visual Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FPI Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SODA Visual Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FPI Studios in 2025.

Incident History — SODA Visual Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SODA Visual Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FPI Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FPI Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soda-visual-ltd.jpeg
SODA Visual Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fpi-studios.jpeg
FPI Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FPI Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SODA Visual Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FPI Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SODA Visual Ltd company.

In the current year, FPI Studios company and SODA Visual Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FPI Studios company nor SODA Visual Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FPI Studios company nor SODA Visual Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FPI Studios company nor SODA Visual Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd company nor FPI Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd nor FPI Studios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd company nor FPI Studios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FPI Studios company employs more people globally than SODA Visual Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd nor FPI Studios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd nor FPI Studios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd nor FPI Studios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd nor FPI Studios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd nor FPI Studios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SODA Visual Ltd nor FPI Studios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N