Comparison Overview

Socrates Sculpture Park

VS

Manchester Historic Association

Socrates Sculpture Park

PO Box 6259, 32-01 Vernon Boulevard, Long Island City, NY 11106, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.socratessculpturepark.org

For over 35 years, Socrates Sculpture Park has been an award winning model of public art production, community activism, and socially inspired place making. Most recently Socrates was honored with the Public Art Dialogue 2023 Founders Award. Over 1,200 artists have created and exhibited new works on its five waterfront acres and outdoor studio facilities. Past exhibiting artists include Agnes Denes, Jeffrey Gibson, Guadalupe Maravilla, Virginia Overton, Jean Shin, Sable Elyse Smith, Nari Ward, Meg Webster, and Hank Willis Thomas. Socrates is free and open to the public 365 days a year from 9am to sunset. It is located at 32-01 Vernon Boulevard (at Broadway) in Long Island City, New York. Socrates Sculpture Park is a not for profit organization licensed by NYC Parks to manage and program Socrates Sculpture Park, a New York City public park.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Manchester Historic Association

200 Bedford Street, 103, Manchester, New Hampshire, US, 03101
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://manchesterhistoric.org

Founded in 1896, the Manchester Historic Association is an independent, 501 (c)(3) nonprofit charitable organization with the mission to collect, preserve and share the history of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA. The Association operates the Millyard Museum and the Research Center, both of which are open to the general public. The Association presents a variety of public programs including lectures, walking tours and concerts, and also school programs for students from third grade through college.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/socrates-sculpture-park.jpeg
Socrates Sculpture Park
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manchester-historic-association.jpeg
Manchester Historic Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Socrates Sculpture Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Manchester Historic Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Socrates Sculpture Park in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manchester Historic Association in 2026.

Incident History — Socrates Sculpture Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Socrates Sculpture Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Manchester Historic Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manchester Historic Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/socrates-sculpture-park.jpeg
Socrates Sculpture Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manchester-historic-association.jpeg
Manchester Historic Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Socrates Sculpture Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Manchester Historic Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Manchester Historic Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Socrates Sculpture Park company.

In the current year, Manchester Historic Association company and Socrates Sculpture Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Manchester Historic Association company nor Socrates Sculpture Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Manchester Historic Association company nor Socrates Sculpture Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Manchester Historic Association company nor Socrates Sculpture Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park company nor Manchester Historic Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park nor Manchester Historic Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park company nor Manchester Historic Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Socrates Sculpture Park company employs more people globally than Manchester Historic Association company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park nor Manchester Historic Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park nor Manchester Historic Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park nor Manchester Historic Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park nor Manchester Historic Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park nor Manchester Historic Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Socrates Sculpture Park nor Manchester Historic Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References