Comparison Overview

Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI)

VS

Atlassian

Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI)

8 Plaza Gardens, 88 Upper Richmond Road London, Putney SW15 2DT, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-17 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Social360 is a leading online media monitoring and analysis company, working with some of the biggest global brands and communications consultancies in the world. What sets us apart is our absolute focus on accuracy and relevance in every situation we track, delivering hand-picked critical insight that matters to your business. Our model is grounded in proprietary technology, scanning and harvesting vast online datasets and constantly refining searches based on clientsโ€™ requirements. Skilled and experienced communications teams edit and prioritise this intelligence, spotting trends and identifying influencers to deliver high-level, succinct and curated insight directly to our clients.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atlassian

Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practices. Over 300,000 global companies and 80% of the Fortune 500 rely on Atlassianโ€™s software, like Jira, Confluence, Loom, and Trello, to help their teams work better together and deliver quality results on time. With our 300,000+ customers and team of 10,000+ Atlassians, we are building the next generation of team collaboration and productivity software. We believe the power of teams has the potential to change the worldโ€”one that is more open, authentic, and inclusive.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17,274
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlassian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlassian in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Template Injection Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Stolen Login Credentials
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Atlassian company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Atlassian company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Atlassian company and Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlassian company nor Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlassian company nor Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlassian company nor Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Atlassian company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Atlassian company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company.

Atlassian company employs more people globally than Social360 (Acquired by Signal AI) company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H