Comparison Overview

Soccer 2000

VS

Newton Running Company

Soccer 2000

224 Ogden Ave, Downers Grove, IL, 60515, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Soccer 2000 was started as a family business to fulfill our passion towards the sport of soccer. Over the years, we have shifted this passion towards our customers ensuring every visit to our store is a memorable one. Soccer 2000 specializes in soccer products - footwear, equipment, and team uniforms.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Newton Running Company

1375 Walnut St., Suite 100, Boulder, Colorado, 80302, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We exist so that every stride is better. Founded in Boulder, Colorado by a group of runners and coaches, Newton Running is the leading Natural Running footwear brand. Using patented Action/Reaction™ technology, Newton Running shoes help runners achieve a more efficient running form. In addition to its devotion to help people run better, Newton Running is dedicated to reducing the environmental impact of its products and is committed to be a responsible corporate citizen through the support of numerous charitable organizations. Newton Running shoes are available at hundreds of specialty retails across the country and around the world, or at www.newtonrunning.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soccer-2000.jpeg
Soccer 2000
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newton-running-company.jpeg
Newton Running Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Soccer 2000
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Newton Running Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Soccer 2000 in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newton Running Company in 2025.

Incident History — Soccer 2000 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Soccer 2000 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Newton Running Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newton Running Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soccer-2000.jpeg
Soccer 2000
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newton-running-company.jpeg
Newton Running Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Soccer 2000 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newton Running Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Newton Running Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Soccer 2000 company.

In the current year, Newton Running Company company and Soccer 2000 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Newton Running Company company nor Soccer 2000 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Newton Running Company company nor Soccer 2000 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Newton Running Company company nor Soccer 2000 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Soccer 2000 company nor Newton Running Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Soccer 2000 nor Newton Running Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Soccer 2000 company nor Newton Running Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Newton Running Company company employs more people globally than Soccer 2000 company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Soccer 2000 nor Newton Running Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Soccer 2000 nor Newton Running Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Soccer 2000 nor Newton Running Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Soccer 2000 nor Newton Running Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Soccer 2000 nor Newton Running Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Soccer 2000 nor Newton Running Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H