Comparison Overview

Snapask

VS

Cognitive ToyBox

Snapask

台北市基隆路一段 200 號 9F, Taipei City, Taiwan, 10557, TW
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

🤘 Story Founded in 2015, Snapask is an education technology company that applies machine learning and mobile cloud services to make education more effective, personalised, and accessible to everyone. Snapask launched its flagship mobile application featuring its “Question & Answer” (Q&A) service. It connects students in need with qualified tutors within seconds. The release of "Learning Planner"​ feature in 2018 takes Snapask 1 step closer towards providing personalised learning support to students. This feature supports personalised content recommendation based on students'​ revision habits and learning progress. Snapask is currently supporting 4.5 million students across 9 regions in APAC in their after school studies. Striving to be the biggest and best online learning platform available to students. 🎸 Mission Learning on Snapask is a student-driven experience, designed around personalization, motivation and prediction. Using Snapask, students are encouraged to take initiative in their own learning. By revealing their learning progress, coursework and teaching approaches can be adapted to match student learning goals and aspiration. Leveraging insights and behaviours generated from student usage across the platform, Snapask creates self-directed learning experiences that feature personal learning support, motivated learning habits, and predicted learning achievement. 🦄 Product Snapask Q&A: When students need help with homework or revision, they snap a photo of their question on Snapask. Based on every student's unique needs, Snapask connects them with qualified tutors within 15 seconds. Together with the student, the tutor will tackle the question step by step. Learning Planner: Snapask recommends revision quizzes to students based on their learning habits and needs. We analyze every student's learning progress on our platform to uncover their strengths and weaknesses, helping them master their subject material.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cognitive ToyBox

150 Court St, Brooklyn, New York, US, 11201
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Cognitive ToyBox is an early childhood platform for kindergarten readiness. The company delivers research-backed assessments and interventions through touchscreen games. Teachers use the platform to get the data they need to assess individual student needs, diagnose issues, and intervene where needed. The company has received grants from the National Science Foundation, the Robin Hood Foundation, and NewSchools Venture Fund and serves school districts with Head Start and Pre-K programs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snapask.jpeg
Snapask
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognitive-toybox.jpeg
Cognitive ToyBox
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Snapask
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cognitive ToyBox
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Snapask in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cognitive ToyBox in 2025.

Incident History — Snapask (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snapask cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cognitive ToyBox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cognitive ToyBox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snapask.jpeg
Snapask
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognitive-toybox.jpeg
Cognitive ToyBox
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Snapask company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cognitive ToyBox company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cognitive ToyBox company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Snapask company.

In the current year, Cognitive ToyBox company and Snapask company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cognitive ToyBox company nor Snapask company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cognitive ToyBox company nor Snapask company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cognitive ToyBox company nor Snapask company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Snapask company nor Cognitive ToyBox company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Snapask nor Cognitive ToyBox holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Snapask company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cognitive ToyBox company.

Snapask company employs more people globally than Cognitive ToyBox company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Snapask nor Cognitive ToyBox holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Snapask nor Cognitive ToyBox holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Snapask nor Cognitive ToyBox holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Snapask nor Cognitive ToyBox holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Snapask nor Cognitive ToyBox holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Snapask nor Cognitive ToyBox holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X