Comparison Overview

Smith Stone Walters Ltd

VS

Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C.

Smith Stone Walters Ltd

12 Masons Avenue, London, undefined, EC2V 5BT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Smith Stone Walters, we deliver a wide range of services, including work and residence permit authorisation, in more than 100 countries worldwide. Managing the immigration process is what we do best. We are here to guide your organisation. Our dedicated immigration team fully manages both global and country specific immigration programmes. We understand the issues your organisation will encounter. Our primary focus is to facilitate employee mobility via the provision of a coordinated and compliant service. By partnering with Smith Stone Walters, you will streamline the immigration journey, neutralise any risk, and ensure that your organisation is provided with strategic solutions to any immigration based issues. Our aim is to ensure the successful cross-border passage of your international assignees.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C.

9515 E 59th St, Suite B, Indianapolis, Indiana, US, 46216
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. has decades of experience representing homeowners associations and condominium associations throughout Indiana. With an exclusive focus on community association law, the firm’s seven attorneys partner with associations on everything from corporate governance and amending covenants to litigation and enforcement. Representing associations is all we do!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-stone-walters-ltd.jpeg
Smith Stone Walters Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianahoalaw.jpeg
Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Smith Stone Walters Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smith Stone Walters Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Smith Stone Walters Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smith Stone Walters Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-stone-walters-ltd.jpeg
Smith Stone Walters Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianahoalaw.jpeg
Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smith Stone Walters Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Smith Stone Walters Ltd company.

In the current year, Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company and Smith Stone Walters Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company nor Smith Stone Walters Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company nor Smith Stone Walters Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company nor Smith Stone Walters Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd company nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Smith Stone Walters Ltd company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company.

Smith Stone Walters Ltd company employs more people globally than Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Smith Stone Walters Ltd nor Eads Murray & Pugh, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X