Comparison Overview

Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting

VS

Sublet Defense

Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting

400 N High Street, Suite 200, Muncie, Indiana, 47305-1643, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Smith Reporting is Indiana's preferred stenographic court reporting services company, covering Indianapolis and the State of Indiana. We provide the perfect mixture of small-firm personalized, friendly service with large-firm technology, work product, and professionalism. Established in 1983, over the years we have built a solid reputation for quality and dependability. Superb, professional court reporting and accurate transcripts remain our top priorities. The Smith Reporting office staff is dedicated to providing you with prompt, courteous, and personal service, and our court reporters are among the most reliable and highly skilled stenographers in Indiana. Our videographers are also always available to ensure that you have a video record to go with the written transcript. We take great pride in the loyal client base we have built over the last three decades by providing consistently excellent and dependable service. We are also excited to welcome new clients each and every day. Although our home office is located in Muncie, Indiana, our court reporters are mainly based out of Indianapolis and the surrounding areas, and they are happy to travel to wherever in the state your proceeding needs to be held.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sublet Defense

1011 w. Wellington Ave., Chicago, Il, 60657, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

What we do: We stop your tenants from hosting on vacation sites, like Airbnb. We have the proprietary tools to catch them and the know-how to stop them fast. Our service includes powerful legal coverage, to take action quickly. Plus, Sublet Defense integrates seamlessly with your current property management in place.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-reporting.jpeg
Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/subletdefense.jpeg
Sublet Defense
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sublet Defense
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sublet Defense in 2025.

Incident History — Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sublet Defense (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sublet Defense cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-reporting.jpeg
Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/subletdefense.jpeg
Sublet Defense
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sublet Defense company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sublet Defense company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company.

In the current year, Sublet Defense company and Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sublet Defense company nor Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sublet Defense company nor Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sublet Defense company nor Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company nor Sublet Defense company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting nor Sublet Defense holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company nor Sublet Defense company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting company employs more people globally than Sublet Defense company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting nor Sublet Defense holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting nor Sublet Defense holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting nor Sublet Defense holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting nor Sublet Defense holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting nor Sublet Defense holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Smith Reporting is now Circle City Reporting nor Sublet Defense holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X