Comparison Overview

Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company

VS

Gladstone Printing

Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company

2867 East Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19134, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Diverse Clients. Diverse Needs. One Dynamic Solution. As Philadelphia’s leading commercial printing company, Smith-Edwards-Dunlap (SED) has built a reputation of achieving high levels of client satisfaction through exceptional service and high quality commercial printing production. What sets us apart from other commercial printing companies is our ability to integrate century-old values and traditions with continually evolving modern technology and exceptional customer service. In fact, we are so obsessed with meeting and exceeding expectations that we tailor our commercial printing process to each job and then execute with the efficiency that clients can rely on. Smith-Edwards-Dunlap’s tradition is a promise to exceed client expectation through loyalty and dedication. The commitment to printing technology, combined with relentless care in execution, is how Smith-Edwards-Dunlap satisfies that promise.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gladstone Printing

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12

About Us Gladstone Printing is a full service commercial printer able to handle any size printing project. Gladstone is located 3 miles West of downtown Lansing. The employees at Gladstone are true craftsman and take ownership of each clients' project. We specialize in short run four color printing and digital printing. Mission Statement: Our mission to exceed client expectations by providing highest quality product in a timely manner. We create long-lasting relationships with our clients so we can help them meet their goals and objectives. Company History Gladstone Printing is independently owned by Travis Millbrook. The company was purchased in 2002 from the Gladstone Family, which had owned and operated the company in Lansing for over 20 years. Entering the new century, Gladstone has embraced new digital technology. We understand that investment in technology can save client costs by improving efficiencies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-edwards-dunlap-company.jpeg
Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gladstone-printing.jpeg
Gladstone Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gladstone Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gladstone Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gladstone Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gladstone Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-edwards-dunlap-company.jpeg
Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gladstone-printing.jpeg
Gladstone Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gladstone Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gladstone Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company.

In the current year, Gladstone Printing company and Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gladstone Printing company nor Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gladstone Printing company nor Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gladstone Printing company nor Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company nor Gladstone Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company nor Gladstone Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company nor Gladstone Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company company employs more people globally than Gladstone Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company nor Gladstone Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company nor Gladstone Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company nor Gladstone Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company nor Gladstone Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company nor Gladstone Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company nor Gladstone Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L