Comparison Overview

Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen

VS

Driscoll Kingston Solictors

Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen

Julianastraat1, Haarlem, 2012 ER, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen is gespecialiseerd op verschillende rechtsgebieden zoals familierecht, erfrecht en estate planning, vennootschapsrecht en onroerend goed. Ook zijn wij actief op nieuwe terreinen als het levenstestament, de digitale kluis en mediation. Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen is een maatschappelijk betrokken kantoor. We staan midden in de samenleving en ondersteunen vanuit dit besef diverse instellingen, goede doelen en organisaties.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Driscoll Kingston Solictors

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Driscoll Kingston Solicitors in Liverpool we have helped thousands of people make compensation claims. If you have had an accident you could be entitled to financial compensation. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We take on most work on a no-win, no-fee basis, and deal with both corporate clients and individuals throughout the UK. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you need legal help and advice on an accident or injury claim you can contact us on 0800 088 61661.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-boeser-van-grafhorst-notarissen.jpeg
Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/driscoll-kingston-solictors.jpeg
Driscoll Kingston Solictors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Driscoll Kingston Solictors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Driscoll Kingston Solictors in 2025.

Incident History — Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Driscoll Kingston Solictors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Driscoll Kingston Solictors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-boeser-van-grafhorst-notarissen.jpeg
Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/driscoll-kingston-solictors.jpeg
Driscoll Kingston Solictors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Driscoll Kingston Solictors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Driscoll Kingston Solictors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company.

In the current year, Driscoll Kingston Solictors company and Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Driscoll Kingston Solictors company nor Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Driscoll Kingston Solictors company nor Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Driscoll Kingston Solictors company nor Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Driscoll Kingston Solictors company employs more people globally than Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Smith Boeser van Grafhorst notarissen nor Driscoll Kingston Solictors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X