Comparison Overview

Smart Traffic Systems

VS

Ingeinnova

Smart Traffic Systems

79 Station Rd, Seven Hills, New South Wales, 2147, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Smart Traffic Systems is a proud representative of the German brand MSR Traffic which specialises in manufacturing of SMART TRAFFIC AND PARKING GUIDANCE SYSTEMS. We provide innovative indoor and outdoor car park solutions using ultrasonic and magnetic field sensors which guides commuters to the nearest available parking spot using modern LED signage systems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ingeinnova

C/ Albert Einstein 44, Ed. E6 Of. 306, Miñano, Álava/Araba, ES, 01510
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Ingeinnova Group gathers experience and expertise of engineering companies servicing in automotive, aeronautics, and clean technologies fields. All of them share a common service model designed to be tailored to customer needs but owning, as well, its particular know-how and expertise in process development, product development, production issues and their inherent state-of-the-art technologies. An experienced, talented, and efficient engineering staff is readily available for large or small customer programs to offer those required engineering solutions to fit customer needs, from single tasks to comprehensive turnkey solutions. INGEINNOVA members are, namely: Ingeinnova Automotive has its core in simulation and automation systems of lines or lean manufacturing, and "turnkey” projects. Ingeinnova Aeronautics is focused in engineering services: Aerodynamic optimization. Aircraft Stress & Loads Analysis. Design & Drafting. CAE Simulation. Tooling design. FEM – Structural analysis. CFD – Fluid-dynamic analysis Ingeinnova Clean Tech deploys its activity in CP (Clean Production) technologies, especially in the project development of clean energies and technologies as tidal generators, water purifiers, wind turbines, etc. Ingeinnova Group is a member of Dynamik Technological Alliance, which is an international multi-technology supplier Group. Its strength lies in its wide-ranging engineering skills and broad product range, ensuring High Added Value.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-traffic-systems.jpeg
Smart Traffic Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingeinnova.jpeg
Ingeinnova
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Smart Traffic Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ingeinnova
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Traffic Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingeinnova in 2025.

Incident History — Smart Traffic Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Traffic Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ingeinnova (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingeinnova cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-traffic-systems.jpeg
Smart Traffic Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingeinnova.jpeg
Ingeinnova
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Smart Traffic Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ingeinnova company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ingeinnova company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Smart Traffic Systems company.

In the current year, Ingeinnova company and Smart Traffic Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ingeinnova company nor Smart Traffic Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ingeinnova company nor Smart Traffic Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ingeinnova company nor Smart Traffic Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems company nor Ingeinnova company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems nor Ingeinnova holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems company nor Ingeinnova company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Smart Traffic Systems company employs more people globally than Ingeinnova company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems nor Ingeinnova holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems nor Ingeinnova holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems nor Ingeinnova holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems nor Ingeinnova holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems nor Ingeinnova holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems nor Ingeinnova holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H