Comparison Overview

Smart Policy Works

VS

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.

Smart Policy Works

205 W. Randolph St., Chicago, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Smart Policy Works brings decades of experience to help clients respond to the rapidly changing healthcare landscape. We can provide organizations with strategies, policies, training and community-based partnerships that lead to success. A Chicago-based nonprofit with a national agenda, SPW (formerly Health & Disability Advocates) has a 25-year history of changing policies to improve the lives of people in need by training, connecting, and empowering those who serve them.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.

7704 Georgetown Pike, McLean, VA 22102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. is a boutique regulatory affairs advisory firm. We help cutting-edge biopharma, medical device, and combination product clients distill complex health care issues into meaningful commercial and philanthropic opportunities. We advise a wider range of clients, like trade organizations, patient advocacy groups and academic institutions, who have specific issues before the FDA, as well as those focused on building longer-term win-win relationships. Our expertise includes understanding the regulatory and policy environment, identifying novel regulatory pathways for cutting edge health care technologies, regulatory intelligence gathering designed to inform corporate strategy, and helping clients understand the current FDA. Follow us on Twitter: @Catalyst_HC_C

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-policy-works.jpeg
Smart Policy Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalyst-healthcare-consulting-inc-.jpeg
Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Smart Policy Works
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Policy Works in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Smart Policy Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Policy Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-policy-works.jpeg
Smart Policy Works
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalyst-healthcare-consulting-inc-.jpeg
Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Smart Policy Works company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Smart Policy Works company.

In the current year, Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company and Smart Policy Works company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company nor Smart Policy Works company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company nor Smart Policy Works company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company nor Smart Policy Works company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Smart Policy Works company nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Smart Policy Works nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Smart Policy Works company nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Smart Policy Works company and Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Smart Policy Works nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Smart Policy Works nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Smart Policy Works nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Smart Policy Works nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Smart Policy Works nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Smart Policy Works nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H