Comparison Overview

Smack Mellon

VS

Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Smack Mellon

92 Plymouth Street , Brooklyn, New York, 11201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Smack Mellon is a nonprofit arts organization located in DUMBO, Brooklyn. Smack Mellon’s mission is to nurture and support emerging, under-recognized mid-career, and women artists in the creation and exhibition of new work, by providing exhibition opportunities, studio workspace, and access to equipment and technical assistance for the realization of ambitious projects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Institute of Chinese Studies, New Territories, Hong Kong, HK
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Founded in 1971, Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong serves the university community and the Hong Kong SAR by collecting, preserving, researching and exhibiting a wide range of artifacts illuminating the rich arts, humanities, and cultural heritage of ancient and pre-modern China. The Art Museum promotes the excellence of both its permanent collections and loan collections of Chinese art and their use for scholarly endeavours and outreach efforts. As a university teaching museum, it offers in-depth practice of museology and archaeology as well as teaching of art history through direct and sustained access to original Chinese works of art in collaboration with the Department of Fine Arts and the Centre for Chinese Archaeology and Art. With the support of different faculties it advocates interdisciplinary approaches to the social, cultural, technological, and historical context of Chinese art.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smack-mellon-gallery.jpeg
Smack Mellon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-museum-the-chinese-university-of-hong-kong.jpeg
Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Smack Mellon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smack Mellon in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2026.

Incident History — Smack Mellon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smack Mellon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smack-mellon-gallery.jpeg
Smack Mellon
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-museum-the-chinese-university-of-hong-kong.jpeg
Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smack Mellon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Smack Mellon company.

In the current year, Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company and Smack Mellon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company nor Smack Mellon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company nor Smack Mellon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company nor Smack Mellon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Smack Mellon company nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Smack Mellon nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Smack Mellon company nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Smack Mellon company and Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Smack Mellon nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Smack Mellon nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Smack Mellon nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Smack Mellon nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Smack Mellon nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Smack Mellon nor Art Museum, The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H