Comparison Overview

Sloma & Co.

VS

Ohio State Bar Association

Sloma & Co.

288 jiujiang Road, Shanghai, shanghai, 200002, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Sloma & Co., a law firm providing various legal services, is headquartered in Shanghai and has branches in Suzhou (Kunshan), Shenzhen and Berlin. Sloma & Co. boasts of more than 70 professional lawyers practicing in various areas cover almost all legal-related areas, including litigation and arbitration, corporate and finance, foreign direct investment, mergers and acquisitions, project loans, banking, intellectual property rights, real estate transactions, commerce, shipping, shipbuilding financing, insurance, criminal defense, marriage and family, inheritance, etc. On 1 September 2007, Seaway Law Firm and Sloma & Co formally merged into Sloma & Co.. Seaway Law Firm, founded in 1995, is a law firm practicing in the areas of corporate and finance, foreign direct investment, intellectual property rights, media, entertainment and maritime affairs. Sloma & Co, founded in 2001, is an international-based law firm practicing in the areas of maritime affairs and international trading. Merger of the two firms significantly enhances Sloma & Co.’s proficiency in maritime affairs, intellectual property rights, corporate and finance, foreign direct investment, and international trading. All partners firmly believe that, by merging the two firms into one firm, “the sum of one plus one is greater than two”. The objective of Sloma & Co. is to provide our clients with first-class legal services in this time full of opportunities and challenges.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ohio State Bar Association

1700 Lake Shore Drive, Columbus, Ohio, 43204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Ohio State Bar Association, founded in 1880, is a voluntary professional association open to any person who has been admitted to the practice of law. Law school students, paralegal students, and paralegals and legal administrators are eligible for membership in the OSBA as associate members. The OSBA represents more than 25,000 Ohio lawyers and judges, nearly 68 percent of Ohio law practitioners. Total membership is about 30,000, which includes associate members. From the date of its founding until today, the Association’s working goals have been to: * advance the science of jurisprudence; * promote improvement of the law and administration of justice; * uphold integrity, honor and courtesy in the legal profession and encourage and enforce adherence to high standards of professional conduct; * take positions on matters of public interest as deemed advisable; * encourage thorough legal education * cultivate cordial relations among members of the Bar; and * perpetuate the history of the profession and the Association. As Ohio’s largest network of legal professionals, the OSBA’s mission is to improve access to justice for all Ohioans, advance the legal profession and advocate for our members. Our core values are member satisfaction, professionalism, foresight, and quality services and products. Our goal is to make membership in the Ohio State Bar Association indispensable to Ohio lawyers. View our social networking policy here: http://www.ohiobar.org/snpolicy

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sloma-&-co..jpeg
Sloma & Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohio-state-bar-association.jpeg
Ohio State Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sloma & Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ohio State Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sloma & Co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ohio State Bar Association in 2025.

Incident History — Sloma & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sloma & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ohio State Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ohio State Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sloma-&-co..jpeg
Sloma & Co.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohio-state-bar-association.jpeg
Ohio State Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sloma & Co. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ohio State Bar Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ohio State Bar Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sloma & Co. company.

In the current year, Ohio State Bar Association company and Sloma & Co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ohio State Bar Association company nor Sloma & Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ohio State Bar Association company nor Sloma & Co. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ohio State Bar Association company nor Sloma & Co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sloma & Co. company nor Ohio State Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sloma & Co. nor Ohio State Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sloma & Co. company nor Ohio State Bar Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ohio State Bar Association company employs more people globally than Sloma & Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Sloma & Co. nor Ohio State Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sloma & Co. nor Ohio State Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sloma & Co. nor Ohio State Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sloma & Co. nor Ohio State Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sloma & Co. nor Ohio State Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sloma & Co. nor Ohio State Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X