Comparison Overview

SlideTeam

VS

Applus+

SlideTeam

1350 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 10019, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

SlideTeam-Your presentation partner for the AI age. Our platform offers the world’s most extensive library of professional PowerPoint templates, along with design support and AI automation, to help you present faster, better, and with less effort. Over 2M templates, slides, and diagrams for every use case Custom content and design services tailored to your brand AI-powered presentation generator: go from idea to deck in a minute Helping teams craft compelling content, design smarter, and present faster.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 115
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Applus+

C/Campezo 1, Edificio 3, Madrid, Madrid, 28022, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Applus+ is a worldwide leader in the testing, inspection, and certification sector. We are a trusted partner, enhancing the quality and safety of our clients’ assets and infrastructures while safeguarding their operations and improving their environmental performance. Our innovative approach, technical capabilities and highly-skilled and motivated workforce of over 25,000 employees assure operational excellence across multiple sectors in more than 65 countries. We offer a complete portfolio of solutions that address a range of needs, from asset integrity management to statutory compliance-based inspections. We place a strong emphasis on technological development, digitalisation and innovation, as well as having the latest knowledge of regulatory requirements.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 17,977
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slide-team.jpeg
SlideTeam
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applus.jpeg
Applus+
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SlideTeam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Applus+
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SlideTeam in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applus+ in 2025.

Incident History — SlideTeam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SlideTeam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Applus+ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applus+ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slide-team.jpeg
SlideTeam
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applus.jpeg
Applus+
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Applus+ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SlideTeam company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SlideTeam company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Applus+ company has not reported any.

In the current year, Applus+ company and SlideTeam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Applus+ company nor SlideTeam company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SlideTeam company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Applus+ company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Applus+ company nor SlideTeam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SlideTeam company nor Applus+ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SlideTeam nor Applus+ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Applus+ company and SlideTeam company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Applus+ company employs more people globally than SlideTeam company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither SlideTeam nor Applus+ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor Applus+ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor Applus+ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor Applus+ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor Applus+ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor Applus+ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N