Comparison Overview

Sleep Train

VS

Michi Designs

Sleep Train

2205 Plaze Drive, Rocklin, CA, 95765, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sleeptrain.com

Sleep Train was founded in 1985 and is ranked the #1 mattress retailer on the West Coast. Sleep Train has nearly locations that span the West Coast and more than 1,500 employees. Sleep Train offers its employees one of the most robust training programs in the industry, comprehensive benefits, performance incentives, and an emphasis on corporate philanthropy with paid time off for volunteering. Sleep Train is known for offering customers the best selection of high-quality mattress brands, superior customer service, and the lowest prices backed by the Sleep Train price guarantee. Sleep Train has been recognized with several regional awards including being named: **“Best Beds & Mattresses” in the Bay Area A-List **“Best Mattress Store” in the Sacramento-based KCRA A-List

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 245
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Michi Designs

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.michidesigns.com

Michi has been building fashionable lighting and accent furniture for interiors for over 20 years. Our complete catalog features a variety of lighting and table styles with a broad array of finishes. In addition to our standard product line, we also specialize in custom manufacturing to your specifications. We work in a wide variety of materials, and have made everything from large feature entry way pendants to ADA projection corridor sconces. And since we design and build our products in Bend, Oregon we can proudly say they are Made in America.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sleep-train.jpeg
Sleep Train
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michi-designs.jpeg
Michi Designs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sleep Train
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Michi Designs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sleep Train in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michi Designs in 2025.

Incident History — Sleep Train (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sleep Train cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Michi Designs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michi Designs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sleep-train.jpeg
Sleep Train
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michi-designs.jpeg
Michi Designs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Michi Designs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sleep Train company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Michi Designs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sleep Train company.

In the current year, Michi Designs company and Sleep Train company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Michi Designs company nor Sleep Train company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Michi Designs company nor Sleep Train company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Michi Designs company nor Sleep Train company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sleep Train company nor Michi Designs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sleep Train nor Michi Designs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sleep Train company nor Michi Designs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Sleep Train nor Michi Designs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sleep Train nor Michi Designs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sleep Train nor Michi Designs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sleep Train nor Michi Designs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sleep Train nor Michi Designs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sleep Train nor Michi Designs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References