Comparison Overview

Slater Gordon Solutions

VS

Fedele and Murray, P.C.

Slater Gordon Solutions

50 – 52 Chancery Lane,, London, undefined, WC2A 1HL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Slater Gordon Solutions is an integrated service offering which takes a customer from an accident through to resolution seamlessly. We resolve personal injury claims fairly and quickly. Even small injuries can have a big impact on people’s lives. We give each and every claim the attention it deserves through specialist expertise. Our team has processed more claims for injured people than anyone else in the UK.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fedele and Murray, P.C.

17 Walpole St, Norwood, Massachusetts, 02062, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Fedele and Murray, P.C. is a professional corporation offering complete legal services to individuals, corporations, institutions, and estates. The base of the firm's practice consists of: Estate Planning Estate Administration Family and Domestic Relations Law Corporate Tax and Financial Planning Real Estate Charitable Giving Taxation The attorneys and clients of the firm are supported by an experienced staff and an infrastructure that includes state of the art computer and software systems, including specialized software systems relating particularly to the firm's estate planning and estate administration practice developed by Mr. Fedele.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slatergordonsolutions.jpeg
Slater Gordon Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fedele-and-murray-p.c..jpeg
Fedele and Murray, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Slater Gordon Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fedele and Murray, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Slater Gordon Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fedele and Murray, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Slater Gordon Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Slater Gordon Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fedele and Murray, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fedele and Murray, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slatergordonsolutions.jpeg
Slater Gordon Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fedele-and-murray-p.c..jpeg
Fedele and Murray, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Slater Gordon Solutions company and Fedele and Murray, P.C. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Fedele and Murray, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Slater Gordon Solutions company.

In the current year, Fedele and Murray, P.C. company and Slater Gordon Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fedele and Murray, P.C. company nor Slater Gordon Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fedele and Murray, P.C. company nor Slater Gordon Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fedele and Murray, P.C. company nor Slater Gordon Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions company nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions company nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Slater Gordon Solutions company employs more people globally than Fedele and Murray, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Slater Gordon Solutions nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X