Comparison Overview

Slackline Industries

VS

Trek Bicycle

Slackline Industries

5665 Avenue Royalmount, Mont-Royal, undefined, H4P 2P9, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Slackline Industries (SI) is the premier brand in slacklining, providing a range of high-quality products to support the entire spectrum of slackline styles and users. SI is dedicated to leading the industry in standard-setting product innovations that focus on performance, safety and environmentally responsible etiquette, ultimately, "Putting our Values on the Line."​ SI will continue to fuel the growth of the sport and the slackline community worldwide by educating, connecting and supporting all users from the beginner to pro athlete level. Slackline Industries was officially launched on October 1, 2014 by the team at Canaima Outdoors Inc., former North American distributor of Gibbon Slacklines. SI President, Ricardo Bottome, states, “Over the past five years our team has worked to take slacklining from a fairly exclusive activity to a mainstream sport. We had so many new ideas for products and programs to continue gaining exposure; it was just time to branch out on our own. We're proud of our new brand and fully expect SI to become the new market leader.” For more information about the brand, products, or the sport of slacklining, visit www.slacklineindustries.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Trek Bicycle

801 W. Madison St, Waterloo, 53594, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Trek is a place where you’re valued for being you. If you’re really into bikes, that’s great. If you’re not (yet), that’s great too. Because there’s a lot more to Trek than bikes. Every person has a unique history and life experience to bring to the table. We respect that. It’s what makes us who we are. At Trek, there's only one standard you have to meet - love. Learn more of why Trek is a Great Place to Work: trekbikes.com/careers

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3,456
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slacklineindustries.jpeg
Slackline Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trekbikes.jpeg
Trek Bicycle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Slackline Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trek Bicycle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Slackline Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trek Bicycle in 2025.

Incident History — Slackline Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Slackline Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trek Bicycle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trek Bicycle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slacklineindustries.jpeg
Slackline Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trekbikes.jpeg
Trek Bicycle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Trek Bicycle company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Slackline Industries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trek Bicycle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Slackline Industries company.

In the current year, Trek Bicycle company and Slackline Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trek Bicycle company nor Slackline Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trek Bicycle company nor Slackline Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trek Bicycle company nor Slackline Industries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Slackline Industries company nor Trek Bicycle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Slackline Industries nor Trek Bicycle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Slackline Industries company nor Trek Bicycle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Trek Bicycle company employs more people globally than Slackline Industries company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Slackline Industries nor Trek Bicycle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Slackline Industries nor Trek Bicycle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Slackline Industries nor Trek Bicycle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Slackline Industries nor Trek Bicycle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Slackline Industries nor Trek Bicycle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Slackline Industries nor Trek Bicycle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H