Comparison Overview

Slack Attack Communications

VS

AF Communication

Slack Attack Communications

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Slack Attack is a full service agency specializing in publishing and event coordination services primarily for trade associations such as the Wisconsin Medical Society, Associated General Contractors of Wisconsin, Tavern League of Wisconsin, Madison Area Builders Association, Electrical Association, National Electrical Contractors Association and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. At Slack Attack, we have over 20 years of experience helping businesses and trade associations with a wide variety of tasks, from full-color magazines, newsletters and brochures, to ads, press releases, corporate identity and logo design. From planning and design to production, printing, distribution, ad sales, billing, and financial management, an excellent publication requires constant attention. As an alternative, Slack Attack can offer you a one-stop solution, providing all the services you need to deliver an informative, well-designed, and profitable publication. We have developed a method of producing quality publications that not only enhances the image of our clients, but provides them with significant revenue as well. Whatever your company needs in the way of advertising and promotion materials, Slack Attack can do it. Let our friendly, expert staff help find solutions to all your marketing communication needs. We invite you to contact us today to learn more about how we can put our expertise to work for your organization.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AF Communication

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Notre métier s’articule autour de 2 prestations de base : l'EDITION de supports de communication la REGIE PUBLICITAIRE de ces supports afin d’en assurer le financement total ou partiel Depuis plus de 20 ans, l'entreprise a développé des savoir-faire, des hommes, des femmes, et surtout des idées, des actions, dans les métiers des médias et de la régie publicitaire. Basée depuis son origine à Montélimar (26), au cœur de la Vallée du Rhône, à égale distance de Marseille et de Lyon, AF COMMUNICATION a intégré depuis 2012 son nouveau siège social, fonctionnel et novateur, en zone d’activités de Fortuneau. AF COMMUNICATION : la société d’origine, le « canal historique », du Groupe. Elle regroupe aujourd’hui les activités de régie publicitaire : - du pôle RADIOS (NRJ, Nostalgie et Chérie fm) 9 stations en Drôme, Ardèche, Vaucluse - des supports institutionnels du pôle EDITION (Mairies, Communautés de Communes, Offices de Tourisme ...) Elle intègre également l’ensemble des services du back-office du groupe (pôle administratif et pôle P.A.O.) L'équipe C’est la véritable richesse du groupe. Les plus anciens collaborateurs, dont certains sont présents depuis la première heure, y transmettent leur savoir-faire et la culture de l’entreprise aux plus jeunes récemment recrutés. Il se compose de : - Force de vente : 45 personnes - Administratif : 5 personnes - Pôle P.A.O. : 6 personnes

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slack-attack-communications.jpeg
Slack Attack Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/af-communication.jpeg
AF Communication
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Slack Attack Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AF Communication
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Slack Attack Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AF Communication in 2025.

Incident History — Slack Attack Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Slack Attack Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AF Communication (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AF Communication cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slack-attack-communications.jpeg
Slack Attack Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/af-communication.jpeg
AF Communication
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Slack Attack Communications company and AF Communication company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, AF Communication company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Slack Attack Communications company.

In the current year, AF Communication company and Slack Attack Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AF Communication company nor Slack Attack Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AF Communication company nor Slack Attack Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AF Communication company nor Slack Attack Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Slack Attack Communications company nor AF Communication company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Slack Attack Communications nor AF Communication holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Slack Attack Communications company nor AF Communication company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AF Communication company employs more people globally than Slack Attack Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Slack Attack Communications nor AF Communication holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Slack Attack Communications nor AF Communication holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Slack Attack Communications nor AF Communication holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Slack Attack Communications nor AF Communication holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Slack Attack Communications nor AF Communication holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Slack Attack Communications nor AF Communication holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.