Comparison Overview

Skysis

VS

KPMG UK

Skysis

11445 E. Via Linda, Suite 2621, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Skysis is now Avalere Health. Visit AvalereHealth.com to learn more. Avalere Health is a leading global commercialization partner for the biopharmaceutical, medical technology, and wellness industries. Working from advisory to performance, we combine our knowledge and expertise across our disciplines โ€” Consulting; Medical; Policy, Access, Value, and Evidence; Marketing; and Digital Experience Technology โ€” to help our clients navigate the complex and rapidly changing healthcare ecosystem. Together, we connect patients with life-changing therapies, realizing the potential of strategies and solutions that improve lives and make better health happen.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KPMG UK

15 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, GB, E14 5GL
Last Update: 2025-09-23 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

KPMG LLP is a leading UK provider of tax, audit and advisory services. We are a UK limited liability partnership, employing 14,000 people in 22 offices across the country. We focus on clientsโ€™ big issues and opportunities by providing innovative approaches and deep expertise to deliver real results. KPMG LLP is a global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 15,006
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skysis-llc.jpeg
Skysis
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg-uk.jpeg
KPMG UK
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Skysis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KPMG UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skysis in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG UK in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Skysis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skysis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” KPMG UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skysis-llc.jpeg
Skysis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg-uk.jpeg
KPMG UK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Skysis company and KPMG UK company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, KPMG UK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Skysis company.

In the current year, KPMG UK company and Skysis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KPMG UK company nor Skysis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KPMG UK company nor Skysis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KPMG UK company nor Skysis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Skysis company nor KPMG UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

KPMG UK company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Skysis company.

KPMG UK company employs more people globally than Skysis company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.