Comparison Overview

SkyLabs d.o.o.

VS

Rheinmetall

SkyLabs d.o.o.

Zagrebška cesta 104, Maribor, 2000, SI
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 650 and 699

SkyLabs is a space-technology oriented company providing miniaturized on-board data handling solutions and innovative approach to space engineering. SkyLabs is primarily focusing onto high-tech tailor-made solution development, including fault tolerant hardware and software development, digital signal processing, radiation hardened by design IP core development, fast prototyping, and space/ground segment communication. Skylabs Vision: We are innovating the space market with SkyLabs disruptive technologies, products and solutions to change the layout of space. DIFFERENT Leveraging new concepts and innovative technologies to drive the emerging aerospace market. RESILIENT Providing a sophisticated fault tolerant design to facilitate profit-driven nano-scale aerospace applications. EFFICIENT Reducing overall system complexity by combining next level of integration with higher performance levels and decreased costs of production.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall Platz 1, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein Westfalen, DE, 40476
Last Update: 2026-01-19

As an integrated technology group, the listed company Rheinmetall AG, headquartered in Düsseldorf, stands for a company that is as strong in substance as it is successful internationally, and that is active in various markets with an innovative range of products and services. Rheinmetall is a leading international systems supplier in the defence industry and at the same time a driver of forward-looking technological and industrial innovations in the civilian markets. The focus on sustainability is an integral part of Rheinmetall's strategy. The company aims to achieve CO2 neutrality by 2035. Through our work in various fields, we at Rheinmetall take on responsibility in a dramatically changing world. With our technologies, products and systems, we create the indispensable basis for peace, freedom and sustainable development: security. Find more Information about your career opportunities here: https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/career/career-overview IMPRINT AND DATA PROTECTION https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/meta/navigations/footer/imprint

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 13,844
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skylabs.si.jpeg
SkyLabs d.o.o.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rheinmetall.jpeg
Rheinmetall
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SkyLabs d.o.o.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rheinmetall
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SkyLabs d.o.o. in 2026.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rheinmetall in 2026.

Incident History — SkyLabs d.o.o. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SkyLabs d.o.o. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rheinmetall (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rheinmetall cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skylabs.si.jpeg
SkyLabs d.o.o.
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unremediated vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rheinmetall.jpeg
Rheinmetall
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rheinmetall company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SkyLabs d.o.o. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rheinmetall company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to SkyLabs d.o.o. company.

In the current year, Rheinmetall company and SkyLabs d.o.o. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Rheinmetall company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SkyLabs d.o.o. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SkyLabs d.o.o. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Rheinmetall company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Rheinmetall company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SkyLabs d.o.o. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. company nor Rheinmetall company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. nor Rheinmetall holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rheinmetall company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SkyLabs d.o.o. company.

Rheinmetall company employs more people globally than SkyLabs d.o.o. company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. nor Rheinmetall holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. nor Rheinmetall holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. nor Rheinmetall holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. nor Rheinmetall holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. nor Rheinmetall holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SkyLabs d.o.o. nor Rheinmetall holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N