Comparison Overview

Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C.

VS

The Health Law Firm

Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C.

293 Eisenhower Parkway, Livingston, New Jersey, 07039, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. is one of New Jersey’s best-known law firms focusing on real property tax appeals, matrimonial law, and commercial litigation. We have a team of skilled attorneys who are dedicated to providing the best legal services possible and to meeting the needs of our clients, whether they are individuals or businesses. Our goal is to provide the highest level of services in each of our practice areas. Not only do we provide a level of sophistication comparable to New Jersey’s largest law firms, we do so with a focus on providing individualized attention and developing personal relationships with our clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Health Law Firm

1101 Douglas Avenue, Altamonte Springs, FL, 32714, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Health Law Firm concentrates on representing health care providers. Our health law attorneys and paralegals have decades of experience in the legal and health care fields. Our health law attorneys include those Board Certified in Health Law, Masters degree trained, former hospital counsel and licensed health care professionals. Our clients include physicians, dentists, nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists, medical students, nursing homes, home health agencies, hospitals, health insurers, medical groups, durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers, and other health care providers. The services we provide include reviewing and negotiating contracts, business transactions, license defense, investigation representation, credential defense, Medicare and Medicaid audits, covenants-not-to-compete, formation of corporations and LLCs, medical board hearings, peer review actions, pain management and pain medicine physician defense, pain management clinic defense, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) defense, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) defense, clinical privileges hearings representation, Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) representation, National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) representation, United States Medical Licensing Examination (U.S.M.L.E.) challenges and representation, commercial and business litigation, administrative hearings and other matters of Health Law and legal representation of health care professionals.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skoloff-&-wolfe-p.c..jpeg
Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-health-law-firm.jpeg
The Health Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Health Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Health Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Health Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Health Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skoloff-&-wolfe-p.c..jpeg
Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-health-law-firm.jpeg
The Health Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Health Law Firm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Health Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company.

In the current year, The Health Law Firm company and Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Health Law Firm company nor Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Health Law Firm company nor Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Health Law Firm company nor Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company nor The Health Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. nor The Health Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company nor The Health Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. company employs more people globally than The Health Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. nor The Health Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. nor The Health Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. nor The Health Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. nor The Health Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. nor The Health Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C. nor The Health Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X