Comparison Overview

Skirball Cultural Center

VS

Limburgs Museum

Skirball Cultural Center

2701 N. Sepulveda Dr., Los Angeles, CA, US, 90049
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skirball.org

The Skirball Cultural Center is a place of meeting guided by the Jewish tradition of welcoming the stranger and inspired by the American democratic ideals of freedom and equality. The Skirball welcomes people of all communities and generations to participate in cultural experiences that celebrate discovery and hope, foster human connections, and call upon us to help build a more just society.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 205
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Limburgs Museum

Keulsepoort 5, Venlo, 5911 BX, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799
http://www.limburgsmuseum.nl

Het Limburgs Museum is een provinciaal museum waarin de geschiedenis en cultuur centraal staan. In elf vaste presentaties maakt de bezoeker een verrassende ontdekkingstocht door de tijd: van prehistorie naar onze tijd. Het verhaal over de geschiedenis, tradities en leefstijlen wordt verteld op een aantrekkelijke manier. Leuk voor alle leeftijden!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skirball-cultural-center.jpeg
Skirball Cultural Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/limburgs-museum.jpeg
Limburgs Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Skirball Cultural Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Limburgs Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skirball Cultural Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Limburgs Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Skirball Cultural Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skirball Cultural Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Limburgs Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Limburgs Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skirball-cultural-center.jpeg
Skirball Cultural Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/limburgs-museum.jpeg
Limburgs Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Skirball Cultural Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Limburgs Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Limburgs Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Skirball Cultural Center company.

In the current year, Limburgs Museum company and Skirball Cultural Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Limburgs Museum company nor Skirball Cultural Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Limburgs Museum company nor Skirball Cultural Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Limburgs Museum company nor Skirball Cultural Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center company nor Limburgs Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center nor Limburgs Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center company nor Limburgs Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Skirball Cultural Center company employs more people globally than Limburgs Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center nor Limburgs Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center nor Limburgs Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center nor Limburgs Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center nor Limburgs Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center nor Limburgs Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Skirball Cultural Center nor Limburgs Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References