Comparison Overview

SK Telecom Americas

VS

VEON

SK Telecom Americas

150 Mathilda Place, Suite 450, Sunnyvale, CA, US, 94086
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.skta.com

SK Telecom America (SKTA) is focused on the future and is hard at work developing what’s next. Our intention is to be the leader in providing innovative experiences in the convergence world. We are driving innovation and globalization by: * Developing new growth businesses * Providing differentiated customer experiences * Spreading innovation to global markets Located in Silicon Valley, California, SKTA is part of South Korea's largest telecommunications company and a global Information and Communications Technology (ICT) leader. Want to learn more about our businesses? Take a look at what we're creating: http://www.skta.com

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

VEON

Index Tower, Trade Centre, Dubai International Financial Centre , Dubai, United Arab Emirates, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.veon.com/

VEON is a global digital operator headquartered in Dubai, providing connectivity and digital services across dynamic frontier markets that are home to more than 6% of the world’s population. With our digital operators, we transform lives through technology-driven services that empower millions and drive economic growth. Social media guidelines: We want everybody to have a positive and welcoming experience across the social media channels we use - and so we ask that everyone keeps their comments and discussions on VEON's page, or posts tagging the company, respectful to other members and our teams. Content which is abusive or harassing, obscene, deceptive or misleading, contains false or defamatory information, is discriminatory against any individual or group, or is considered spam may be removed - including reporting and blocking users responsible from our social media channels.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 12,981
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sk-telecom-americas.jpeg
SK Telecom Americas
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veon.jpeg
VEON
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SK Telecom Americas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VEON
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

SK Telecom Americas has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VEON in 2025.

Incident History — SK Telecom Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SK Telecom Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VEON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VEON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sk-telecom-americas.jpeg
SK Telecom Americas
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veon.jpeg
VEON
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VEON company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SK Telecom Americas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SK Telecom Americas and VEON have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, SK Telecom Americas company has reported more cyber incidents than VEON company.

Neither VEON company nor SK Telecom Americas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SK Telecom Americas company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other VEON company has not reported such incidents publicly.

VEON company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SK Telecom Americas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SK Telecom Americas company nor VEON company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor VEON holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VEON company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SK Telecom Americas company.

VEON company employs more people globally than SK Telecom Americas company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor VEON holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor VEON holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor VEON holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor VEON holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor VEON holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor VEON holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References