Comparison Overview

SK Telecom Americas

VS

Orange

SK Telecom Americas

150 Mathilda Place, Suite 450, Sunnyvale, CA, US, 94086
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 600 and 649

SK Telecom America (SKTA) is focused on the future and is hard at work developing what’s next. Our intention is to be the leader in providing innovative experiences in the convergence world. We are driving innovation and globalization by: * Developing new growth businesses * Providing differentiated customer experiences * Spreading innovation to global markets Located in Silicon Valley, California, SKTA is part of South Korea's largest telecommunications company and a global Information and Communications Technology (ICT) leader. Want to learn more about our businesses? Take a look at what we're creating: http://www.skta.com

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Orange

111, Quai du Président Roosevelt, None, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Île-de-France, FR, 92130
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549

Orange is one of the world’s leading telecommunications operators with revenues of 40.3 billion euros in 2024 and 127,000 employees worldwide at 31 December 2024, including 71,000 employees in France. The Group has a total customer base of 291 million customers worldwide at 31 December 2024, including 253 million mobile customers and 22 million fixed broadband customers. The Group is present in 26 countries. Orange is also a leading provider of global IT and telecommunication services to multinational companies under the brand Orange Business. In February 2023, the Group presented its strategic plan « Lead the future », built on a new business model and guided by responsibility and efficiency. « Lead the future » capitalizes on network excellence to reinforce Orange's leadership in service quality.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 132,461
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sk-telecom-americas.jpeg
SK Telecom Americas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange.jpeg
Orange
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SK Telecom Americas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orange
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

SK Telecom Americas has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Orange has 294.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — SK Telecom Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SK Telecom Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orange (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sk-telecom-americas.jpeg
SK Telecom Americas
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange.jpeg
Orange
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation de données personnelles volées, Ingénierie sociale, SIM swapping
Motivation: Fraude financière, Vol d'identité, Accès non autorisé à des comptes en ligne
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: ransomware (Warlock), system compromise
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SK Telecom Americas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orange company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Orange company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to SK Telecom Americas company.

In the current year, Orange company has reported more cyber incidents than SK Telecom Americas company.

Orange company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SK Telecom Americas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Orange company and SK Telecom Americas company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Orange company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SK Telecom Americas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SK Telecom Americas company nor Orange company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor Orange holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Orange company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SK Telecom Americas company.

Orange company employs more people globally than SK Telecom Americas company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor Orange holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor Orange holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor Orange holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor Orange holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor Orange holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor Orange holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N