Comparison Overview

SJM Resorts

VS

Shangri-La Group

SJM Resorts

Alameda Dr. Carlos d'Assumpção No. 255 China Civil Plaza, 10 Andar Macau, Macau 853, MO
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sjmjob.com

SJM Resorts, S.A. ("SJM") is one of the six concessionaires in Macau, authorised by the Government of the Macau Special Administrative Region to operate casinos and gaming areas. SJM is also the only casino gaming concessionaire with its roots in Macau. SJM owns and operates the Grand Lisboa Palace Resort, the Grand Lisboa hotel and casino, as well as other casinos located in prime locations in Macau. The Company's operations cater to a wide spectrum of patrons, with casino gaming, leisure entertainment and hospitality services including fine and casual dining and luxury accommodation. The Grand Lisboa Palace, SJM's integrated resort on Cotai, opened its doors to the public on 30 July 2021. In the initial phase opening, the resort offers luxury hotel rooms and suites, fine and casual dining, gaming, shopping, wellness and spa facilities and events spaces. THE KARL LAGERFELD hotel tower was added to the resort's diversified offerings on 3 December 2021. Additional features to be inaugurated include the hotel tower Palazzo Versace Macau, as well as more facilities for meetings and conferences, shopping and dining.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Shangri-La Group

Kerry Centre, 683 King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749
http://www.shangri-la.com/group/

Headquartered in Hong Kong SAR, the Shangri-La Group has grown from a single hotel business to a diverse and integrated global portfolio comprising quality real estate and investment properties, wellness and lifestyle facilities. Today, the Group owns, operates and manages 100+ hotels under our family of five brands: Shangri-La, Shangri-La Signatures, Kerry Hotels, JEN by Shangri-La, and Traders. We are part of the Kuok Group, one of Asia's most dynamic multinational conglomerates and a leader in properties, logistics, agribusiness, maritime and hospitality. From our strong base in Asia, we have expanded into key gateway cities and markets around the world. Our properties sit on some of the world’s most prestigious addresses and exotic destinations. Through the environments we have created, we enable people to come together to live, work, play, eat, and rest well.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 16,184
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sjm-holdings.jpeg
SJM Resorts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shangri-la-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Shangri-La Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SJM Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shangri-La Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SJM Resorts in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shangri-La Group in 2025.

Incident History — SJM Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SJM Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shangri-La Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shangri-La Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sjm-holdings.jpeg
SJM Resorts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shangri-la-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Shangri-La Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SJM Resorts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shangri-La Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Shangri-La Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SJM Resorts company has not reported any.

In the current year, Shangri-La Group company and SJM Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shangri-La Group company nor SJM Resorts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Shangri-La Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SJM Resorts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Shangri-La Group company nor SJM Resorts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SJM Resorts company nor Shangri-La Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Shangri-La Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SJM Resorts company.

Shangri-La Group company employs more people globally than SJM Resorts company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References