Comparison Overview

SJM Resorts

VS

Kempinski Hotels

SJM Resorts

Alameda Dr. Carlos d'Assumpção No. 255 China Civil Plaza, 10 Andar Macau, Macau 853, MO
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sjmjob.com

SJM Resorts, S.A. ("SJM") is one of the six concessionaires in Macau, authorised by the Government of the Macau Special Administrative Region to operate casinos and gaming areas. SJM is also the only casino gaming concessionaire with its roots in Macau. SJM owns and operates the Grand Lisboa Palace Resort, the Grand Lisboa hotel and casino, as well as other casinos located in prime locations in Macau. The Company's operations cater to a wide spectrum of patrons, with casino gaming, leisure entertainment and hospitality services including fine and casual dining and luxury accommodation. The Grand Lisboa Palace, SJM's integrated resort on Cotai, opened its doors to the public on 30 July 2021. In the initial phase opening, the resort offers luxury hotel rooms and suites, fine and casual dining, gaming, shopping, wellness and spa facilities and events spaces. THE KARL LAGERFELD hotel tower was added to the resort's diversified offerings on 3 December 2021. Additional features to be inaugurated include the hotel tower Palazzo Versace Macau, as well as more facilities for meetings and conferences, shopping and dining.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kempinski Hotels

Maximilianstrasse 17, Munich, 80539, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
https://www.kempinski.jobs

Founded in Germany in 1897, Kempinski Hotels has long reflected the finest traditions of European hospitality. Today, as ever, Kempinski is synonymous with distinctive luxury. Located in many of the world's most well-known cities and resorts, the Kempinski collection includes hotels in a grand manner, pace-setting modern establishments and older hotels of individual charm. All blend gracefully into their surroundings and offer luxurious accommodations, superb cuisine and unrivalled facilities - complemented by impeccable service. For leisure and business guests alike, the name Kempinski has long been synonymous with style, mobility and efficiency. Put simply, they are the first choice for the discerning individual. In addition to operating many of the finest city hotels in the world, Kempinski is a name that can now be found in many exciting resort locations, each combining local flair and ambience with the international standards of service and luxury that Kempinski guests have come to expect. To see all the different Kempinski jobs and apply please go to https://kempinski.jobs

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 13,663
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sjm-holdings.jpeg
SJM Resorts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kempinski-hotels.jpeg
Kempinski Hotels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SJM Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kempinski Hotels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SJM Resorts in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kempinski Hotels in 2025.

Incident History — SJM Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SJM Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kempinski Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kempinski Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sjm-holdings.jpeg
SJM Resorts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kempinski-hotels.jpeg
Kempinski Hotels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kempinski Hotels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SJM Resorts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kempinski Hotels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SJM Resorts company.

In the current year, Kempinski Hotels company and SJM Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kempinski Hotels company nor SJM Resorts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kempinski Hotels company nor SJM Resorts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kempinski Hotels company nor SJM Resorts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SJM Resorts company nor Kempinski Hotels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Kempinski Hotels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SJM Resorts company nor Kempinski Hotels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kempinski Hotels company employs more people globally than SJM Resorts company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Kempinski Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Kempinski Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Kempinski Hotels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Kempinski Hotels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Kempinski Hotels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SJM Resorts nor Kempinski Hotels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References