Comparison Overview

Sixpenny

VS

GRASS Australia / New Zealand

Sixpenny

undefined, New York, NY , undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our story starts with a two-inch nail known to woodworkers as the sixpenny—an understated necessity that reminds us of an important truth: In our world and in your home, details make all the difference. Good furniture is common. Great furniture is Sixpenny. The marketplace is saturated with “good”—countless (read: uninspired) riffs on yesterday’s designs that sacrifice details in order to deliver passable products at “affordable” prices. We like affordability, but we’re not sold on compromises. They’re what separates common from extraordinary—an important distinction we’re sure you’ll know when you see it. Some call us control freaks (they’re not wrong), but we think covering all the bases is what sets us apart from the pack. Only great materials make great products, so we source our own and we design every piece from scratch. We know a supply chain shouldn’t cut corners, so we steer the ship ourselves and provide a new level of quality at a price worthy of a double-take. And as a guest in your home, we know that customers are as good as family, so we bring our best table manners everywhere we go. As certified homebodies we also believe we’re citizens of the globe. We’re passionate about making our collective home a better place to live, so we partner with like-minded do-gooders to help build resources like homes and schools for communities in need. With every Sixpenny purchase, we donate 6% of our proceeds to the community-building project of your choice. We know that details are the real difference between “good” and “great,” and we’re prepared to obsess over every last one. That’s the point of Sixpenny.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GRASS Australia / New Zealand

GF. 4-10 Amsterdam Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

GRASS GmbH is a company within the internationally acclaimed Würth Group. Our quality European manufactured kitchen and furniture hardware brings movement to life. With quality and innovation at our core, our soft close drawer slides (also called drawer runners), soft close hinges, flaps, flap hinges and drawer accessory solutions should be on everyone’s shopping list. As a company based in Richmond, Australia, we provide valuable support to our dealership network in both Australia and New Zealand and aim to create awareness regarding the quality and benefits of our movement systems. GRASS has won more design and innovation awards than any other furniture manufacturer in the world. No matter how big or small your needs please feel to contact us so that we can help connect you with the right product partner or find that product solution that you have long been searching for. Our key products categories are Nova Pro (Scala, Deluxe and Classic), Vionaro, Dynapro, DWD XP, Tiomos, Nexis and Kinvaro. GRASS products are sold in over 60 countries around the world with over 200 distribution partners.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sixpenny-home.jpeg
Sixpenny
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grassmovementsystems.jpeg
GRASS Australia / New Zealand
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sixpenny
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GRASS Australia / New Zealand
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sixpenny in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GRASS Australia / New Zealand in 2025.

Incident History — Sixpenny (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sixpenny cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GRASS Australia / New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GRASS Australia / New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sixpenny-home.jpeg
Sixpenny
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grassmovementsystems.jpeg
GRASS Australia / New Zealand
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sixpenny company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GRASS Australia / New Zealand company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GRASS Australia / New Zealand company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sixpenny company.

In the current year, GRASS Australia / New Zealand company and Sixpenny company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GRASS Australia / New Zealand company nor Sixpenny company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GRASS Australia / New Zealand company nor Sixpenny company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GRASS Australia / New Zealand company nor Sixpenny company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sixpenny company nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sixpenny nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GRASS Australia / New Zealand company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sixpenny company.

Sixpenny company employs more people globally than GRASS Australia / New Zealand company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Sixpenny nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sixpenny nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sixpenny nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sixpenny nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sixpenny nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sixpenny nor GRASS Australia / New Zealand holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.