Comparison Overview

Sit On Design

VS

Systems Furniture

Sit On Design

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Vente d'objets de décoration et de mobilier design via: - notre boutique déco à Liège; - notre site de vente en ligne trilingue. Nous proposons du mobilier design dans un bon rapport qualité/prix en provenance d'Europe avec une prédilection pour le design scandinave. Nous promouvons également des designers locaux qui s'auto-produisent sous le label "My Belgium Design". Nous proposons aussi du mobilier lumineux (bar, table...) parfaitement adapté à des événements (salons, foires...) Sit On Design offre des conditions avantageuses pour les professionnels (contact: [email protected]). Il est possible de commander et payer en ligne. Nous livrons partout en Europe.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Systems Furniture

3509 Commerce Blvd, White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Furnishing your office is one of the biggest investments you’ll make, and, it’s a major design and logistical challenge. Our team of office furniture experts makes it easy. We’ve worked with more than 100 companies of all sizes to build and install comfortable, productive office spaces.We’re a consultative partner, guiding you through the process of building your ideal workspace, from selecting the right office system to layout design and installation.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sit-on-design.jpeg
Sit On Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/systems-furniture.jpeg
Systems Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sit On Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Systems Furniture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sit On Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Systems Furniture in 2025.

Incident History — Sit On Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sit On Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Systems Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Systems Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sit-on-design.jpeg
Sit On Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/systems-furniture.jpeg
Systems Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Systems Furniture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sit On Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Systems Furniture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sit On Design company.

In the current year, Systems Furniture company and Sit On Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Systems Furniture company nor Sit On Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Systems Furniture company nor Sit On Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Systems Furniture company nor Sit On Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sit On Design company nor Systems Furniture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sit On Design nor Systems Furniture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sit On Design company nor Systems Furniture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Systems Furniture company employs more people globally than Sit On Design company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Sit On Design nor Systems Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sit On Design nor Systems Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sit On Design nor Systems Furniture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sit On Design nor Systems Furniture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sit On Design nor Systems Furniture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sit On Design nor Systems Furniture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.