Comparison Overview

Sirona Strategies

VS

Federal Customs Authority

Sirona Strategies

1100 H St NW, Washington, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Sirona Strategies is a proactive, strategic health care consulting firm that consistently delivers results for clients seeking to succeed and grow in an evolving health care marketplace. Our first-hand experience with the ACA’s implementation gives us an understanding of how policymakers think and react in times of transformation. We use this expertise to help our clients stay ahead of evolving politics and policy. We are deeply familiar with the intersection of health care policy, politics and business. We counsel clients across the health care spectrum on regulatory, legislative and market dynamics that can be leveraged to best position them in a rapidly shifting environment. Collectively, Sirona Strategies offers clients nearly two decades of experience in health care decision making at the state and federal levels. Having served in senior positions in state governments, Congress and the Administration, Sirona Strategies offers policy expertise, political savvy, business acumen and opportunities to be heard by Washington thought leaders and decision makers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Federal Customs Authority

35000, Ministry Of Finance Building, Old Jawazet Street, Uae, Abu Dhabi, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The FCA was established in 2003 by virtue of decree law No. (1) of 2003, issued by the late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, then the president of the state on the establishment of the FCA. On 21 July 2015, the FCA has shifted to another stage of the customs work upon the issuance of the decree law No. 8 of 2015 as the said law granted the FCA additional powers contributing to protect the community security, facilitate trade, develop and support customs work and promote the UAE competitiveness in this area.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sirona-strategies.jpeg
Sirona Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-customs-authority.jpeg
Federal Customs Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sirona Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Federal Customs Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sirona Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Customs Authority in 2025.

Incident History — Sirona Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sirona Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Federal Customs Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Customs Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sirona-strategies.jpeg
Sirona Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-customs-authority.jpeg
Federal Customs Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Federal Customs Authority company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sirona Strategies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Federal Customs Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sirona Strategies company.

In the current year, Federal Customs Authority company and Sirona Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Federal Customs Authority company nor Sirona Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Federal Customs Authority company nor Sirona Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Federal Customs Authority company nor Sirona Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sirona Strategies company nor Federal Customs Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sirona Strategies nor Federal Customs Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sirona Strategies company nor Federal Customs Authority company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Federal Customs Authority company employs more people globally than Sirona Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Sirona Strategies nor Federal Customs Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sirona Strategies nor Federal Customs Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sirona Strategies nor Federal Customs Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sirona Strategies nor Federal Customs Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sirona Strategies nor Federal Customs Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sirona Strategies nor Federal Customs Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N